Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas

2017-09-21 Thread Diane Trout
I managed to merge the more important doc changes. I have a patch to switch doc building to using Python 3 components, as there's a goal of removing the Python 2 components at some point. The there's the patch for the nodoc/nocheck build profile, as well as adding a bunch of other dependencies

Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas

2017-09-21 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Diane Trout wrote: > On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 17:56 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > If you could allow to review would be great. > > Thanks for all the work. > > I was btw also trying to build with the patch you shared yesterday > Once I have all the changes for pandas

Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas

2017-09-21 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
If you could allow to review would be great. Thanks for all the work. I was btw also trying to build with the patch you shared yesterday On September 21, 2017 5:48:58 PM EDT, Diane Trout wrote: > >> If my poor opinion counts: For the moment we should run those tests >> in >> the

Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas

2017-09-21 Thread Diane Trout
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 17:56 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > If you could allow to review would be great. > Thanks for all the work. > I was btw also trying to build with the patch you shared yesterday Once I have all the changes for pandas would you like me to put them on a branch on alioth?

Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas

2017-09-21 Thread Diane Trout
> If my poor opinion counts: For the moment we should run those tests > in > the build process than can be easily be run. Everything else should > probably be sorted out later (in autopkgtest or another later upload > if > somebody has a clue how we can solve the circular depenendecies). > >

Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas

2017-09-21 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 21/09/17 15:22, Andreas Tille wrote: We somehow need to get some working spatstats to continue with other packages. I second Andreas' opinion. In principle, we'd want all tests to run at build and integration times and we might achieve that at some point during the Buster cycle. Right

Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas

2017-09-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 05:48:48PM +1000, Stuart Prescott wrote: > On Sunday, 17 September 2017 22:14:18 AEST Diane Trout wrote: > > I just did it that way because it was the least disruptive change I > > could make that would let me build and test the package. > > Sure, that's entirely