Matthias Klose wrote:
> The distro should get
> out of the way of using the python symlink, and giving users the freedom /
> choice what to do about the link.
I think I understand your rationale to stop shipping /usr/bin/python and
once the unversioned symlink disappears from use in Debian then
On Friday, May 18, 2018 07:29:19 PM Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 18.05.2018 18:14, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Friday, May 18, 2018 11:31:37 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> On 18.05.2018 05:19, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> >>> [Matthias Klose, 2018-05-17]
> >>>
> PEP 394 [1] saw an update in April
[Víctor Cuadrado Juan, 2018-05-17]
> > I maintain some packages in DPMT, such as:
> > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python3-proselint
> > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-neovim
> > and I wanted to push changes to them.
> >
> > Could somebody add me to the
On 18.05.2018 19:24, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>> A bit disappointed about this style of communication, Matthias
>
> same here (you want us to do something without explaining reasons)
> EOT for me.
well, I thought I explained in the first message. The distro should get out of
the way of using the
On 18.05.2018 18:14, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, May 18, 2018 11:31:37 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 18.05.2018 05:19, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>>> [Matthias Klose, 2018-05-17]
>>>
PEP 394 [1] saw an update in April 2018 [2], the diffs at [3].
The most important change from
> A bit disappointed about this style of communication, Matthias
same here (you want us to do something without explaining reasons)
EOT for me.
--
GPG: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645
On 18.05.2018 19:02, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>> who said, that we should rename packages? The only packages being dropped are
>> the python defaults packages.
>>>
>>> I refuse to do that work!
>>
>> There is no work in renaming the packages. It's about the dependency
>> generation
>> and the
> who said, that we should rename packages? The only packages being dropped are
> the python defaults packages.
> >
> > I refuse to do that work!
>
> There is no work in renaming the packages. It's about the dependency
> generation
> and the shebang.
the work in dh-python is not trivial. The
On Friday, May 18, 2018 11:31:37 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 18.05.2018 05:19, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> > [Matthias Klose, 2018-05-17]
> >
> >> PEP 394 [1] saw an update in April 2018 [2], the diffs at [3].
> >>
> >> The most important change from my point of view is
> >>
> >> -* It is
Hello from the mini-DebConf in Hambug.
I've made some improvements to the Python packaging with gbp-pq wiki page.
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ
I've replaced all the references to alioth with instructions for Salsa.
Feel free to revert or correct any of my changes that you
On 18.05.2018 05:19, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Matthias Klose, 2018-05-17]
>> PEP 394 [1] saw an update in April 2018 [2], the diffs at [3].
>>
>> The most important change from my point of view is
>>
>> -* It is suggested that even distribution-specific packages follow the
>> -
[Matthias Klose, 2018-05-17]
> PEP 394 [1] saw an update in April 2018 [2], the diffs at [3].
>
> The most important change from my point of view is
>
> -* It is suggested that even distribution-specific packages follow the
> - ``python2``/``python3`` convention, even in code that is not
12 matches
Mail list logo
