> Within a given rdeps count it currently has secondary sorting made on
> Bug No. It would polish off the forward deps if they could be used for
> secondary sorting instead (highest number to lowest). Bonus points for
> making the headers clickable so the reader can choose which secondary
On 9/1/19 10:07 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On September 2, 2019 4:00:53 AM UTC, Sandro Tosi wrote:
I would just stop building these. And if the reverse dependencies
py2removal bug itself, then comment in these issues that the
suggested/recommended package gets removed. If they
could someone from salsa-python-admins check my join request please?
fortran-language-server package is implemented in python, so it looks like it
makes sense to have it under PAPT.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:45:53PM +0200, Denis Danilov wrote:
> * I'd like to join
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 04:43:40PM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Looks great, is plenty enough accurate for the task. It tells us it's more
> important to process live-task-standard than python-gnatpython-doc.
live-task-standard just depends on python, without any other python2
On 2019-09-02 12:21, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 9:54 PM Drew Parsons
Yes, your script counts the dependencies along one direction (rdeps),
identifying which packages are ready to be de-python2-ised next.
I'm talking about dependencies in the opposite direction, deps not
Mail list logo