Re: Bug#936604: getmail: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-11-13 Thread Iustin Pop
On 2019-11-14 00:24:15, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 03:31:04PM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: > > On 2019-11-13 15:06:54, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > > On 11/12/19 4:37 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > > > The related binary packages are available in 2 binary names (depending > > > > on release)

Re: FYI: Python 3 migration of distributuion

2019-11-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 11/13/19 6:11 PM, Charles Cazabon wrote: > Unfortunately, it's difficult to find the hours to devote to this task. I > don't know when, or even if, I could have a beta release ready. > >> If you convert python 2 code for 2.7 style, then we can support both >> python 2 and 3. > > I'm not very

Re: FYI: Python 3 migration of distributuion

2019-11-13 Thread Charles Cazabon
Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Currently, getmail is a candidate for removal from the upcoming Debian > release if it is not updated to support python 3 by someone (not > necessary by upstream). Thanks for the update, Osamu. I have actually been playing with a prototype refactoring of getmail to not

Re: getmail: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-11-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 11/13/19 3:31 PM, Iustin Pop wrote: > On 2019-11-13 15:06:54, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 11/12/19 4:37 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote: >>> The related binary packages are available in 2 binary names (depending on >>> release) >>> getmail4 (version=4,5) popcon installed ~2000 >>> getmail

Re: Bug#936604: getmail: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-11-13 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 03:31:04PM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: > On 2019-11-13 15:06:54, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > On 11/12/19 4:37 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > > The related binary packages are available in 2 binary names (depending on > > > release) > > > getmail4 (version=4,5) popcon installed

FYI: Python 3 migration of distributuion

2019-11-13 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, This is just FYI on situation. Currently, getmail is a candidate for removal from the upcoming Debian release if it is not updated to support python 3 by someone (not necessary by upstream). Here is the background Debian and Ubuntu are pushing to remove python2 in next 2020 release.

Re: getmail: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-11-13 Thread Iustin Pop
On 2019-11-13 15:06:54, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 11/12/19 4:37 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > The related binary packages are available in 2 binary names (depending on > > release) > > getmail4 (version=4,5) popcon installed ~2000 > > getmail (version=3,5) popcon installed ~1000 > > > >

Re: Bug#936604: getmail: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-11-13 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 09:27:08AM +0100, Ondrej Novy wrote: > Hi, > > út 12. 11. 2019 v 16:37 odesílatel Osamu Aoki napsal: > > Upstream is active and prides to keep python 2.5 compatibility code in > it ... (Not just 2.7).  I (Osamu Aoki ) and dkg even > made some effort to

Re: Bug#936604: getmail: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-11-13 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 04:57:17PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:37:27AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Upstream is active and prides to keep python 2.5 compatibility code in > > it ... (Not just 2.7). I (Osamu Aoki ) and dkg even > > made some effort to support

Re: getmail: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-11-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 11/12/19 4:37 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote: > The related binary packages are available in 2 binary names (depending on > release) > getmail4 (version=4,5) popcon installed ~2000 > getmail (version=3,5) popcon installed ~1000 > >

Re: reducing matplotlib2 build-depends.

2019-11-13 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Sandro! On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 09:10:49PM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > well, i dont think it's a good reason to just stop testing complex > software tho. some of those dependencies are required so that mpl can > build extensions (in particular for the GUI backends) so if you remove > them, the

Re: getmail: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-11-13 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, út 12. 11. 2019 v 16:37 odesílatel Osamu Aoki napsal: > Upstream is active and prides to keep python 2.5 compatibility code in > it ... (Not just 2.7). I (Osamu Aoki ) and dkg even > made some effort to support both 2 and 3 but the idea was rejected by > upstream in 2018. that's odd :/