On Friday, January 24, 2020 2:00:36 PM EST Scott Kitterman wrote:
> The next step is to deal with all the packages that pip vendors and we
> unvendor. There are quite a few packages that need updating to a sufficient
> version for the new pip:
>
> Needs packaging:
> pep517
I am taking care of
I'm not going to be able to deal with all that by myself, so this is a request
for team members to step up and look at updating these packages. I have not
checked which of these are DPMT maintained, so in some cases the action may be
to work with the maintainer to update their package.
I
On 24.01.20 20:00, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I started looking into updating pip to the current release
thanks for doing that.
> packaging
the recent version is in the archive but ftbfs. it's a dh-python issue.
Matthias
I started looking into updating pip to the current release because I knew it
would take awhile and we need to do it at some point. Merging our changes
into the new upstream release turned out to be somewhat less challenging that
I had feared (alternately it wasn't and I messed it up). I've
4 matches
Mail list logo