Re: Sponsorship backlog

2020-02-11 Thread Jonathan Carter
Hi Utkarsh On 2020/02/12 00:59, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > pyparsing: uploaded! > python-progress: uploaded! > python-urllib3: uploaded! > python-nest-asyncio: uploaded! > djangorestframework-api-key: sent reviews; had autopkgtest failure. > > python-marshmallow-polyfield: was already uploaded. >

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Håvard Flaget Aasen
On 11.02.2020 16:55, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote: On 11.02.2020 15:44, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 2/11/20 11:16 AM, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote: I tried to build python-babel to sponsor the upload from what's in the Git in the DPMT, and it failed to build for me: # Generate the localedata

Re: How to find DD member to perform reviews and uploads

2020-02-11 Thread Adam Cecile
Hello Utkarsh, I fixed the changelog issue, sadly salsa is unresponsive atm so I it's not pushed yet. For the autodep8 issue I know what is going on: For some reasons Django packages, especially Django REST Fmwrk does not follow standard naming scheme so expected package import name is not

Re: Sponsorship backlog

2020-02-11 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi all, On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 4:23 AM Jonathan Carter wrote: > The sponsorship request queue in the IRC topic is getting a bit long > again, I'll try to make time for as many of these as possible this week, > but if anyone can help reviewing these packages from the IRC topic (and > then

Re: How to find DD member to perform reviews and uploads

2020-02-11 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Adam, On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 9:13 AM Adam Cecile wrote: > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/djangorestframework-api-key Could you quickly update d/ch entry date? timewarp-standards-version (2020-01-06 < 2020-01-20) -> 4.5.0 was released afterwards :) Also, there's an autopkgtest

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 2/11/20 4:45 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> In such case, could you provide me with the source package, rather than >> just letting me try with Git? Maybe this is going to work then... > > whatever turns out to be, please ensure the package is buildable from > the git repo. and matches what's going

Re: How to find DD member to perform reviews and uploads

2020-02-11 Thread Adam Cecile
On 2/11/20 9:45 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 2/11/20 12:12 PM, Ondrej Novy wrote: Hi, út 11. 2. 2020 v 11:02 odesílatel Adam Cecile mailto:acec...@le-vert.net>> napsal: Bringing the package into the archive would be doable, if someone get legal contacts at LSI and asked for official

Re: How to find DD member to perform reviews and uploads

2020-02-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 2/11/20 12:12 PM, Ondrej Novy wrote: > Hi, > > út 11. 2. 2020 v 11:02 odesílatel Adam Cecile > napsal: > > Bringing the package into the archive would be doable, if someone get > legal contacts at LSI and asked for official statement authorizing >

Re: Force pushing on salsa?

2020-02-11 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:34:23AM -0500, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > Looking at a package recently, I saw some important mistakes and I was > wondering: would it be ok to force push to fix them? > > More explicitly, the import of the new upstream version with > pristine-tar contains a

Force pushing on salsa?

2020-02-11 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau
Hey folks, Looking at a package recently, I saw some important mistakes and I was wondering: would it be ok to force push to fix them? More explicitly, the import of the new upstream version with pristine-tar contains a bunch of errors due to a wrong manipulation. It seems to me it would be

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Håvard Flaget Aasen
On 11.02.2020 15:44, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 2/11/20 11:16 AM, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote: I tried to build python-babel to sponsor the upload from what's in the Git in the DPMT, and it failed to build for me: # Generate the localedata folder data out of the xml files # downloaded in

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Sandro Tosi
> In such case, could you provide me with the source package, rather than > just letting me try with Git? Maybe this is going to work then... whatever turns out to be, please ensure the package is buildable from the git repo. and matches what's going to be uploaded. We have already enough

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 2/11/20 11:16 AM, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote: > >> >> I tried to build python-babel to sponsor the upload from what's in the >> Git in the DPMT, and it failed to build for me: >> >> # Generate the localedata folder data out of the xml files >> # downloaded in debian/repack >>

I'd like to Join the DPMT

2020-02-11 Thread Sam Hartman
Hi. I've read the DPMT policy and accept it. I find I end up packaging python modules regularly for work and I could just as easily upload the results to Debian when they are of sufficient quality. In this instance, I want a newer version of hvac (which is stuck in new). since I'm starting with

Re: How to find DD member to perform reviews and uploads

2020-02-11 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, út 11. 2. 2020 v 11:02 odesílatel Adam Cecile napsal: > Bringing the package into the archive would be doable, if someone get > legal contacts at LSI and asked for official statement authorizing > Debian to redistribute their binary. I did this in the past for another > package but I cannot

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Håvard Flaget Aasen
I tried to build python-babel to sponsor the upload from what's in the Git in the DPMT, and it failed to build for me: # Generate the localedata folder data out of the xml files # downloaded in debian/repack scripts/import_cldr.py common Processing root.xml (Language = root; Territory = 001)

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Jonathan Carter
On 2020/02/11 12:16, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote: > I can't replicate this. I tried with cowbuilder/pbuilder and sbuild and > the build completes fine on my systems. Ok, thanks. I'll check on a chroot on my system later too to try to see what's going on, but swamped at the moment so can't check

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Håvard Flaget Aasen
I tried to build python-babel to sponsor the upload from what's in the Git in the DPMT, and it failed to build for me: # Generate the localedata folder data out of the xml files # downloaded in debian/repack scripts/import_cldr.py common Processing root.xml (Language = root; Territory = 001)

Re: How to find DD member to perform reviews and uploads

2020-02-11 Thread Adam Cecile
On 2/11/20 9:51 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 2/9/20 3:12 PM, Adam Cecile wrote: Hello Debian-Python, I have a couple of package ready on Salsa but my RFS sent here remained unanswered. So I'm asking again for your help again ! Here is a list of package waiting for uploads:

Re: Separate lib and executable packages?

2020-02-11 Thread Gordon Ball
On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 08:54:27PM +0100, Ondrej Novy wrote: > Hi, > > so 8. 2. 2020 v 20:51 odesílatel Gordon Ball napsal: > > > Perhaps this is worth making an explicit recommendation for new packages > > of this type, given that anything new _should_ be python3-only and we > > > > and what

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Jonathan Carter
Hi Håvard On 2020/02/11 10:33, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I tried to build python-babel to sponsor the upload from what's in the > Git in the DPMT, and it failed to build for me: I'm removing it from the channel topic in the meantime, please re-add when the building is resolved, thanks for your

Re: How to find DD member to perform reviews and uploads

2020-02-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 2/9/20 3:12 PM, Adam Cecile wrote: > Hello Debian-Python, > > > I have a couple of package ready on Salsa but my RFS sent here remained > unanswered. > > So I'm asking again for your help again ! Here is a list of package > waiting for uploads: > > >

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 1/10/20 8:50 PM, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote: > Hello, > > The python-babel [1] package is currently broken, there isn't any bugs > reported yet, but after the transit to > python3.8 it failed the testsuite. New upstream version 2.7.0 and above > fixes these issues. > To update the package there