Joining Debian Python team

2021-09-19 Thread yokota
Hello,

I want to join Debian Python team to help packaging "python-zeroconf"
to work "calibre" well.
Because "python-zeroconf" is required package to "calibre".

Please add me (salsa: yokota) to Debian Python team.

I have read the Debian Python team policy at
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/-/blob/master/policy.rst
.

--
YOKOTA Hiroshi



Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED

2021-09-19 Thread Carsten Schoenert

Hi Antonio,

thanks for your quick feedback!

Am 19.09.21 um 21:24 schrieb Antonio Terceiro:


Looking from my side, the tarball from the archive (apt source
python-django-js-asset) and the one generated by pristine-tar are
identical:

4b6a2c8625b8e96bbc4ff1588a27238d7d418b03  
/tmp/python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz
4b6a2c8625b8e96bbc4ff1588a27238d7d418b03  
/tmp/archive/python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz

 From reading the REJECT email, I think it implies that the .dsc/.changes
you uploaded refer to an orig tarball with 6360 bytes. Do you still have
the exact artifacts that you uploaded?


No, not completely.
But I played around a bit with gbp and pristine-tar too and I was able 
to recreate a tarball which has the same size and the same hashes as the 
*.tar.gz in the archive and the one you've posted by using pristine-tar 
manually.


If I clean out all completely and build the package from scratch by gbp 
I get again a wrong size and of course also different hashes.


Currently I've no real clue why gbp is creating here different results, 
will look again at this once Guido is around, I'm sure he can blame me 
that I'm doing something wrong. :P


I was able to upload 1.2.2-3 successful recently so no big problem any more.

--
Regards
Carsten



Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED

2021-09-19 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi,

On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:27:21AM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Hello Antonio,
> 
> as you initially did the first upload for this package I'm now heading
> over to you.
> 
> Am 19.09.21 um 09:48 schrieb Debian FTP Masters:
> > 
> > python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3.dsc: Invalid size hash for 
> > python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz:
> > According to the control file the size hash should be 6360,
> > but python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz has 6367.
> > 
> > If you did not include python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz in your 
> > upload, a different version
> > might already be known to the archive software.
> 
> I've no idea where the size of 6360 for the orig.tar.gz file is coming
> from which DAK refers.
> 
> If I look at the source package sites or on snapshot.d.o I always see a
> size of 6367.
> 
> https://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/python-django-js-asset
> http://snapshot.debian.org/package/python-django-js-asset/1.2.2-1/
> 
> And this size was recreated by gbp locally.
> But the question is now how to proceed now. A quick & dirty solution
> would be to simply use the old tar.gz file (if available).
> Another option would be more dramatically and let remove the package
> completely from the archive. Do you have opinions on that?

Looking from my side, the tarball from the archive (apt source
python-django-js-asset) and the one generated by pristine-tar are
identical:

4b6a2c8625b8e96bbc4ff1588a27238d7d418b03  
/tmp/python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz
4b6a2c8625b8e96bbc4ff1588a27238d7d418b03  
/tmp/archive/python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz

From reading the REJECT email, I think it implies that the .dsc/.changes
you uploaded refer to an orig tarball with 6360 bytes. Do you still have
the exact artifacts that you uploaded?


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Debian python-language-server package forks

2021-09-19 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:57:44PM +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> the Python language server packages where recently forked upstream (because
> the developers lost access to the original repos) and the development
> shifted there. I started working on new Debian packages for those (cf.
> #994007):
> [...]
> 
> I'm also planning to package these pylsp plugins: pylsp-mypy, pyls-flake8,
> pyls-isort and will fill ITPs for them soon.
> 
> Cheers Jochen

Hi Jochen,

That's fantastic, thanks so much!  I won't have any time to think
about this for the next two weeks, but once they're in unstable, I'll
look at upgrading Spyder to version 5.x.

Best wishes,

   Julian



Request to join the team

2021-09-19 Thread Luiz Amaral
Hello,

I would like to join the Python team to maintain fbtftp[1] (which I
still need a sponsor). After I get more comfortable, I can assist with
maintaining python-ldap3, python-ldap as well as taking care of some RFPs.

I have been packaging proprietary software for Debian as part of my job
for some time and decided that now is a good moment to also contribute
to Open Source.

My Salsa login is lamaral, but my account is not activated yet. Once I
get salsa access, I will move the fbtftp repository there, as it
currently resides in my GitHub[2].

I have read and I accept the the Python Team Policy.

Thank you,
Luiz

[1]: https://mentors.debian.net/package/fbtftp/
[2]: https://github.com/lamaral/debian-fbtftp/





Re: RFS: python-mockito/1.2.2-2 -- Spying framework for Python - documentation

2021-09-19 Thread Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly
Nilesh Patra  writes:

> On 9/19/21 2:29 PM, Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly wrote:

>>  python-mockito (1.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium

> Hi, I do not see these changes in salsa. Still the old changelog.
> can you push? I'll happily sponsor

Oops, done.  Thanks!

-- 
Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly
PGP 01EEACF8244E9C14B551C5256ADA5F189BD322B6



Re: RFS: python-mockito/1.2.2-2 -- Spying framework for Python - documentation

2021-09-19 Thread Nilesh Patra


On 9/19/21 2:29 PM, Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly wrote:
>  python-mockito (1.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>* Source-only upload.

Hi, I do not see these changes in salsa. Still the old changelog.
can you push? I'll happily sponsor

Cheers,

-- 
Nilesh Patra

Debian Developer, Uploading
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   nil...@debian.org / nileshpatra.info / tchncs.de
  ⠈⠳⣄



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


RFS: python-mockito/1.2.2-2 -- Spying framework for Python - documentation

2021-09-19 Thread Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-mockito".

It has already been uploaded with binary packages to unstable.
To reach testing (bookworm), it needs this source-only upload, which is
why I need a sponsor.

 * Package name: python-mockito
   Version : 1.2.2-2
   Upstream Author : https://github.com/kaste/mockito-python/issues
 * URL : https://github.com/kaste/mockito-python
 * License : Expat
 * Vcs : 
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-mockito
   Section : python

It builds those binary packages:

  python-mockito-doc - Spying framework for Python - documentation
  python3-mockito - Spying framework for Python

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-mockito/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-mockito/python-mockito_1.2.2-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 python-mockito (1.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Source-only upload.

Thanks in advance!

Best regards

-- 
Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly
PGP 01EEACF8244E9C14B551C5256ADA5F189BD322B6