Joining Debian Python team
Hello, I want to join Debian Python team to help packaging "python-zeroconf" to work "calibre" well. Because "python-zeroconf" is required package to "calibre". Please add me (salsa: yokota) to Debian Python team. I have read the Debian Python team policy at https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/-/blob/master/policy.rst . -- YOKOTA Hiroshi
Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED
Hi Antonio, thanks for your quick feedback! Am 19.09.21 um 21:24 schrieb Antonio Terceiro: Looking from my side, the tarball from the archive (apt source python-django-js-asset) and the one generated by pristine-tar are identical: 4b6a2c8625b8e96bbc4ff1588a27238d7d418b03 /tmp/python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz 4b6a2c8625b8e96bbc4ff1588a27238d7d418b03 /tmp/archive/python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz From reading the REJECT email, I think it implies that the .dsc/.changes you uploaded refer to an orig tarball with 6360 bytes. Do you still have the exact artifacts that you uploaded? No, not completely. But I played around a bit with gbp and pristine-tar too and I was able to recreate a tarball which has the same size and the same hashes as the *.tar.gz in the archive and the one you've posted by using pristine-tar manually. If I clean out all completely and build the package from scratch by gbp I get again a wrong size and of course also different hashes. Currently I've no real clue why gbp is creating here different results, will look again at this once Guido is around, I'm sure he can blame me that I'm doing something wrong. :P I was able to upload 1.2.2-3 successful recently so no big problem any more. -- Regards Carsten
Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED
Hi, On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:27:21AM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote: > Hello Antonio, > > as you initially did the first upload for this package I'm now heading > over to you. > > Am 19.09.21 um 09:48 schrieb Debian FTP Masters: > > > > python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3.dsc: Invalid size hash for > > python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz: > > According to the control file the size hash should be 6360, > > but python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz has 6367. > > > > If you did not include python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz in your > > upload, a different version > > might already be known to the archive software. > > I've no idea where the size of 6360 for the orig.tar.gz file is coming > from which DAK refers. > > If I look at the source package sites or on snapshot.d.o I always see a > size of 6367. > > https://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/python-django-js-asset > http://snapshot.debian.org/package/python-django-js-asset/1.2.2-1/ > > And this size was recreated by gbp locally. > But the question is now how to proceed now. A quick & dirty solution > would be to simply use the old tar.gz file (if available). > Another option would be more dramatically and let remove the package > completely from the archive. Do you have opinions on that? Looking from my side, the tarball from the archive (apt source python-django-js-asset) and the one generated by pristine-tar are identical: 4b6a2c8625b8e96bbc4ff1588a27238d7d418b03 /tmp/python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz 4b6a2c8625b8e96bbc4ff1588a27238d7d418b03 /tmp/archive/python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz From reading the REJECT email, I think it implies that the .dsc/.changes you uploaded refer to an orig tarball with 6360 bytes. Do you still have the exact artifacts that you uploaded? signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Debian python-language-server package forks
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:57:44PM +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > Hi, > > the Python language server packages where recently forked upstream (because > the developers lost access to the original repos) and the development > shifted there. I started working on new Debian packages for those (cf. > #994007): > [...] > > I'm also planning to package these pylsp plugins: pylsp-mypy, pyls-flake8, > pyls-isort and will fill ITPs for them soon. > > Cheers Jochen Hi Jochen, That's fantastic, thanks so much! I won't have any time to think about this for the next two weeks, but once they're in unstable, I'll look at upgrading Spyder to version 5.x. Best wishes, Julian
Request to join the team
Hello, I would like to join the Python team to maintain fbtftp[1] (which I still need a sponsor). After I get more comfortable, I can assist with maintaining python-ldap3, python-ldap as well as taking care of some RFPs. I have been packaging proprietary software for Debian as part of my job for some time and decided that now is a good moment to also contribute to Open Source. My Salsa login is lamaral, but my account is not activated yet. Once I get salsa access, I will move the fbtftp repository there, as it currently resides in my GitHub[2]. I have read and I accept the the Python Team Policy. Thank you, Luiz [1]: https://mentors.debian.net/package/fbtftp/ [2]: https://github.com/lamaral/debian-fbtftp/
Re: RFS: python-mockito/1.2.2-2 -- Spying framework for Python - documentation
Nilesh Patra writes: > On 9/19/21 2:29 PM, Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly wrote: >> python-mockito (1.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium > Hi, I do not see these changes in salsa. Still the old changelog. > can you push? I'll happily sponsor Oops, done. Thanks! -- Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly PGP 01EEACF8244E9C14B551C5256ADA5F189BD322B6
Re: RFS: python-mockito/1.2.2-2 -- Spying framework for Python - documentation
On 9/19/21 2:29 PM, Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly wrote: > python-mockito (1.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Source-only upload. Hi, I do not see these changes in salsa. Still the old changelog. can you push? I'll happily sponsor Cheers, -- Nilesh Patra Debian Developer, Uploading ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ nil...@debian.org / nileshpatra.info / tchncs.de ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: python-mockito/1.2.2-2 -- Spying framework for Python - documentation
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-mockito". It has already been uploaded with binary packages to unstable. To reach testing (bookworm), it needs this source-only upload, which is why I need a sponsor. * Package name: python-mockito Version : 1.2.2-2 Upstream Author : https://github.com/kaste/mockito-python/issues * URL : https://github.com/kaste/mockito-python * License : Expat * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-mockito Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-mockito-doc - Spying framework for Python - documentation python3-mockito - Spying framework for Python To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-mockito/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-mockito/python-mockito_1.2.2-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: python-mockito (1.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Source-only upload. Thanks in advance! Best regards -- Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly PGP 01EEACF8244E9C14B551C5256ADA5F189BD322B6
