Request to join python-team
Hello team , Just came to know about the sprint happening and I thought to use it as an opportunity to join and contribute to the team :) I've some packaging experience and I intend to work on item #3 listed in the wiki[1] during the sprint As a first step I've fixed #1018583[2] and have pushed my changes here[3]. I would like someone from the team review my changes and I'll push them to the team repo if everything's okay I have read and accepted the policy[4] of the team My salsa login is rmb [1] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1018583 [2] - https://salsa.debian.org/rmb/python-statsd [3] - https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/-/blob/master/policy.rst Thanks :) -- Mohammed Bilal 2D65 BC1E B966 5A6E 97F9 730A B3F5 9452 8521 9E1F OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Request to join the team - salsa: tai271828
Hi Taihsiang (2022.12.02_22:51:03_+) > I would like to join the Debian Python team for the sprint today and > this weekend, and help with more packaging work in the future. Added. Thanks for the help. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ +1 415 683 3272
Request to join the team - salsa: tai271828
Hi,
I would like to join the Debian Python team for the sprint today and
this weekend, and help with more packaging work in the future.
During the sprint and working on this bug
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1018505 , people
("pollo", thank you!) guided me that I should join the team to fit the
workflow easier.
I have read and accepted the policy of the team
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/-/blob/master/policy.rst
.
My salsa account name is tai271828 . Thank you!
Regards,
Tai
Re: Bug#1025164: lintian: missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend tag needs to check Build-Depends-Indep too
On 2022-12-01 01 h 52, Stuart Prescott wrote: Hi Scott On 01/12/2022 15:16, Scott Kitterman wrote: On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 10:38:30 PM EST Stuart Prescott wrote: Hi Scott, On 01/12/2022 02:16, Scott Kitterman wrote: Package: lintian Version: 2.115.3 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org The missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend check appears to only look for the prerequisite packages in Build-Depends, but since they aren't needed for clean, they could be in Build-Depends-Indep, leading to false positives. Scott K I contemplated filing a similar the other day but in writing it up, I realised that lintian was correct. Policy requires that the 'clean' target be functional with only the Build-Depends (and Build-Conflicts) satisfied, and pybuild + the build-backend dependencies are involved in the cleaning step. Not always. At least with the package I ran into this on, clean works fine without them. Yes indeed... - the most obvious case where that works is where 'clean' is explicit in d/rules - it would also be possible for it to work in situations where dh-python is (redundantly?) listed in B-D (not B-D-I), since the pyproject plugin's 'clean' operation has no dependency on `build`, `installer`, and the backend. However, this for this second case: - it might result in pybuild picking a different plugin through lack of dependencies like `tomli`. That might just work... but also feels slightly terrifying. - there's not _currently_ any backend-specific cleaning code, but perhaps there should be, which would then need the deps to be in B-D? (Is that in the spec somewhere?) I guess the main thing to be careful of in any rewording of this explanation is that for the most common case of using "%:\n\tdh --buildsystem pybuild", dh-python (or pybuild-plugin-pyproject) is needed in B-D not B-D-I to be policy-compliant. cheers Stuart I've proposed a fix here: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/426 It's not precise enough to flag packages that would declare everything as a Build-Depends-Indep though. This would be much more complex and I feel this situation is overall pretty rare. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄ OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
python-greenlet update to 2.0.1
Hi Jelmer, It looks like you started working on updating python-greenlet to 2.0.1 (needed because python-gevent was updated and the two versions are now incompatible). Any reason that you stopped or just lack of time? Thanks, Scott
Bug#1025319: ITP: python-blurhash -- Python implementation of the blurhash algorithm
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Edward Betts X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-blurhash Version : 1.1.4 Upstream Author : Lorenz Diener * URL : https://github.com/halcy/blurhash-python * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python Description : Python implementation of the blurhash algorithm BlurHash takes an image, and gives you a short string (only 20-30 characters) that represents the placeholder for this image. You do this on the backend of your service, and store the string along with the image. When you send data to your client, you send both the URL to the image, and the BlurHash string. Your client then takes the string, and decodes it into an image that it shows while the real image is loading over the network. The string is short enough that it comfortably fits into whatever data format you use. For instance, it can easily be added as a field in a JSON object. I plan to maintain this package as part of the Python team.
