Re: Fixing upstream branch after tagging

Hi Guðjón, On 2022-12-05 08:24, Guðjón Guðjónsson wrote: I am working on eric and I made a mistake while updating the git repository. Some paths have changed so files were not excluded correctly and now upstream and pristine-tar contain jquery*.js files. How can I remove the files after

Fixing upstream branch after tagging

Hi list I am working on eric and I made a mistake while updating the git repository. Some paths have changed so files were not excluded correctly and now upstream and pristine-tar contain jquery*.js files. How can I remove the files after having tagged? I read that the pristine-tar branch

Bug#1025456: RM: flask-oidc -- RoM; inactive upstream; never migrated to testing

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hello, I would like to request the removal of flask-oidc from unstable. The package is currently FTBFSing, and while it would be possible to patch it and make it build successfully again, I don't think it's worth the trouble: the package has never

Re: Request to join the team

Hi Malik (2022.12.04_17:03:05_+) > I would like to join the team to help maintaining packages and adopt > easyprocess [1] Welcome to the team, added you. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ +1 415 683 3272

Request to join the team

Hello DPT, I would like to join the team to help maintaining packages and adopt easyprocess [1] I have prepared the easyprocess upgrade and started MRs [2] and would like to request a sponsor to merge these changes into the team repository. I read and accepted the team policy[2] and my

Re: Different behavior of package with pyproject.toml

Scott Kitterman writes: > On December 4, 2022 3:42:15 PM UTC, Ole Streicher wrote: >>So I would suspect that it is already the build does something wrong >>here. Which package is that? pybuild-plugin-pyproject? > > > python3-installer Thank you, I filed a bug. Best Ole

Re: Different behavior of package with pyproject.toml

On December 4, 2022 3:42:15 PM UTC, Ole Streicher wrote: >Hi Scott, > >thanks for the hint. > >Scott Kitterman writes: >> My first guess is that in some circumstances setuptools is doing the >> installing >> and in others it's the dh-python pyproject plugin (using the installer >> module).

Re: Different behavior of package with pyproject.toml

Hi Scott, thanks for the hint. Scott Kitterman writes: > My first guess is that in some circumstances setuptools is doing the > installing > and in others it's the dh-python pyproject plugin (using the installer > module). Looking at the build log on buildd.d.o, I can see that build is >

Re: request for review: python-pyglfw

Hi Timo, Timo Röhling, on 2022-12-04: > * Étienne Mollier [2022-12-04 12:46]: > > I'm a DD, but since this is my first DPT package, I wouldn't be > > against having a second pair of eyeballs having a look at the > > python-pyglfw package I produced this morning[1]. The packaging > > in itself

Re: request for review: python-pyglfw

Hi Étienne, * Étienne Mollier [2022-12-04 12:46]: I'm a DD, but since this is my first DPT package, I wouldn't be against having a second pair of eyeballs having a look at the python-pyglfw package I produced this morning[1]. The packaging in itself was super smooth, I just wanted to make

request for review: python-pyglfw

Hi, I'm a DD, but since this is my first DPT package, I wouldn't be against having a second pair of eyeballs having a look at the python-pyglfw package I produced this morning[1]. The packaging in itself was super smooth, I just wanted to make sure I didn't miss team specific bits; I had the