Does it worth trying to package pyenv for Debian? Ain't it against any rules?
On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 21:39 +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> I agree that xfailing the tests *may* be a reasonable solution. I'm
> only saying that it should be done by someone with more idea than me
> of
> whether these particular tests are important, because blindly
> xfailing
> everything
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote on 06/02/2023 at 22:35:44+0100:
> paramiko 3.0.0 was released two weeks ago. Any reason to not upload
> it now? It would be nice to get into bookworm.
paramiko is a key package. The hard freeze is in a month. Uploading a
new major release right now could break a
I agree that xfailing the tests *may* be a reasonable solution. I'm
only saying that it should be done by someone with more idea than me of
whether these particular tests are important, because blindly xfailing
everything that fails is effectively not having tests.
If we do choose that
paramiko 3.0.0 was released two weeks ago. Any reason to not upload it now? It
would be nice to get into bookworm.
.hc
Hi Andrey,
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 11:53:33AM +0100, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 01:50:34PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Our social contract #4 says "Our priorities are our users and free
> > software". What benefits would having the python3.10 base packages in
> >
On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 11:13 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Rebecca,
>
> Am Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 07:59:17AM + schrieb Rebecca N. Palmer:
> > (Background: the pandas + dask transition broke dask.distributed
> > and it was
> > hence removed from testing; I didn't notice at the time that if we
Hi Scott (2023.01.29_01:34:54_+)
> It'd be much simpler just to drop DPT or myself from uploaders and ignore
> this, so that's probably the path I would take.
The Debian Python Policy is independent of DPT. So, if adopted, that
wouldn't help much... :)
> Regardless, I don't think this is an
On 2/5/23 14:50, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Our social contract #4 says "Our priorities are our users and free
software".
In a Debian thread, invoking the social contract #4, is like owning a
goodwin point. It suggests that the opponent is trying to do something
against the Debian users, which is
On 2/6/23 12:07, Georges Racinet wrote:
On 2/6/23 10:26, Andrej Shadura wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 6 Feb 2023, at 10:05, Georges Racinet wrote:
Hello,
On 1/16/23 23:44, Georges Racinet wrote:
Hi, I just made a new version of the mercurial-evolve package,
following the new upstream 10.5.3. It's
On 2/6/23 10:26, Andrej Shadura wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 6 Feb 2023, at 10:05, Georges Racinet wrote:
Hello,
On 1/16/23 23:44, Georges Racinet wrote:
Hi, I just made a new version of the mercurial-evolve package,
following the new upstream 10.5.3. It's still at
On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 01:50:34PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Our social contract #4 says "Our priorities are our users and free
> software". What benefits would having the python3.10 base packages in
> bookworm bring for our users (as I point out, for some users, this is
> a necessity) and
Hi Rebecca,
Am Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 07:59:17AM + schrieb Rebecca N. Palmer:
> (Background: the pandas + dask transition broke dask.distributed and it was
> hence removed from testing; I didn't notice at the time that if we don't get
> it back in we lose Spyder.)
as far as I know Diane has
Hi,
On Mon, 6 Feb 2023, at 10:05, Georges Racinet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 1/16/23 23:44, Georges Racinet wrote:
>> Hi, I just made a new version of the mercurial-evolve package,
>> following the new upstream 10.5.3. It's still at
>> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/mercurial-evolve.
Hello,
On 1/16/23 23:44, Georges Racinet wrote:
Hi, I just made a new version of the mercurial-evolve package,
following the new upstream 10.5.3. It's still at
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/mercurial-evolve.
Andrej, would you be so kind to take a look at it, I hope the
(Background: the pandas + dask transition broke dask.distributed and it
was hence removed from testing; I didn't notice at the time that if we
don't get it back in we lose Spyder.)
On 05/02/2023 21:44, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
I currently have this in a state where it sometimes succeeds and
16 matches
Mail list logo
