Joining Python Modules team

2018-06-06 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hello,

I would like to join the Python Modules team. I am preparing a package for 
python-reentry, which I would like to maintain together with the team. My salsa 
login is merkys-guest. I have read and I accept the policy as of 
https://web.archive.org/web/20171211221837/http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/policy.html,
 since the alioth.debian.org is down.

Thanks,
Andrius

-- 
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saulėtekio al. 7, room V325
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania




Fwd: Request to join the DPMT

2019-06-13 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hello,

some time ago I've requested to join DPMT as 'merkys' (DD). I used to have
write access as 'merkys-guest', which could be revoked now.

Best,
Andrius

-- Forwarded message -
From: 
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019, 19:24
Subject: Request to join the DPMT
To: 


Hello,

I would like to rejoin the DPMT using my DD account. My new Salsa login
is 'merkys'. The old one, 'merkys-guest', should be removed from the
team. Inside the team I will maintain my Python packages and upload new
ones.

I have read the policy [1] and I accept it.

[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/policy.rst

Best,
Andrius


Re: [packaging] wurlitzer

2019-10-21 Thread Andrius Merkys
On 2019-10-21 16:29, MARIE Alexandre wrote:
> This one works perfectly fine, thanks a lot for giving me some time to help !

You're welcome :)

Andrius



Re: [packaging] wurlitzer

2019-10-21 Thread Andrius Merkys
On 2019-10-21 16:15, MARIE Alexandre wrote:
> I tried it as you said but I still get the same error : 

Hmm. The layout on PyPI seems to have changed. Could you try this now?:

version=4
opts="pgpmode=none" \
 https://pypi.python.org/pypi/wurlitzer/ \
 https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/.*/.*/.*/\
 wurlitzer-([\d\.]+).tar.gz debian uupdate



Re: [packaging] wurlitzer

2019-10-21 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi Alexandre,

On 2019-10-21 15:47, MARIE Alexandre wrote:
> @PACKAGE@-@ANY_VERSION@(?:_src)?@ARCHIVE_EXT@ debian uupdate

Try putting @ANY_VERSION@ inside parenthesis:

@PACKAGE@-(@ANY_VERSION@)(?:_src)?@ARCHIVE_EXT@ debian uupdate

Hope this helps,
Andrius



Re: [packaging] wurlitzer

2019-10-21 Thread Andrius Merkys
On 2019-10-21 16:01, MARIE Alexandre wrote:
> Thanks for your fast answer, but I made a mistake when I pasted the error 
> from the bash.
>
> Here is the real error (according to the d/watch file I gave you) :

I see. Have you tried the third PyPI watch file example from the manpage of 
uscan?:

 version=4
 opts="pgpmode=none" \
 https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cfn-sphere/ \
 https://pypi.python.org/packages/.*/.*/.*/\
 cfn-sphere-([\d\.]+).tar.gz#.* debian uupdate

Just replace 'cfn-sphere' with the name of your package.

Best,
Andrius



Transfer cherrytree from DPT to Debian group

2020-10-16 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hello,

Recently cherrytree [1] has been rewritten from Python to C++, thus it
no longer belongs in DPT. Could someone with adequate permissions
transfer it from DPT to generic Debian group on salsa.d.o?
Alternatively, one could grant me permission to manage cherrytree so as
I could transfer it myself.

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/cherrytree

Thanks,
Andrius



Re: Remove trac from Debian 11?

2021-05-10 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi Martin,

On 2021-05-10 13:35, Martin wrote:
> trac is a long-time Debian package, uploaded first by Jesus
> Climent in 2004. I like the traditional look of Trac and its
> climate-friendly resource usage :-)
> 
> Now, while Trac is still maintained upstream and has been ported
> to Python 3 recently, development slowed down since long and the
> current 1.5.x release series is not yet "there".
> 
> I wonder, whether the package should be part of Debian 11, or
> better miss one stable release and have it in better shape for
> Debian 12.
> 
> If nobody objects, I'll file a bug to keep it out of Debian 11.

I do not think that slowing down of development is reason serious enough
to remove a package which is otherwise fine. Or are there other reasons
that I am not aware of?

Best,
Andrius



Re: Remove trac from Debian 11?

2021-05-20 Thread Andrius Merkys
On 2021-05-10 16:06, Martin wrote:
> On 2021-05-10 14:00, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>> I do not think that slowing down of development is reason serious enough
>> to remove a package which is otherwise fine. Or are there other reasons
>> that I am not aware of?
> 
> I don't have a problem with slow development, but the current
> version is probably not good enough to maintain it for some
> years. I'm optimistic, that in some months or so 1.6.x will
> be released, which should be fine. I'm planning to backport it
> to Debian 11, so that users still can install trac easily.

Thanks for explanation. Makes sense, I agree with your decision.

Best,
Andrius



Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye

2021-02-12 Thread Andrius Merkys
On 2021-02-12 16:18, Simon McVittie wrote:
> We have a python3 package already. If I saw a python3 package and a
> python3-core package, I would expect that either they're the same thing,
> or python3-core is a smaller and less fully-featured version of python3.
> 
> Conversely, we already have a python3-minimal package, and I would expect
> python3-core to be larger and more fully-featured than python3-minimal
> (or maybe the same), because by definition if it's minimal then it's
> the least Python you can have. So:
> 
> python3-minimal ≤ python3-core ≤ python3 ≤ python3-full

+1. Exactly how I would understand these names.

Andrius