Questions about PAPT and the uploading process

2010-01-06 Thread Umang
dir on the svn repo before I make an RFS? 5.lintian complains about my not using my full name in the package. Is that necessary? Is it bad if I use only my first name? Thank you, Umang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubs

Re: Questions about PAPT and the uploading process

2010-01-09 Thread Umang
three different days for sid. "$ pbuilder create" just doesn't create a base.tgz at all. I haven't been able to even attempt a build. My package builds successfully on a base.tgz for lenny. Is this sufficient? Or should I keep trying sid everyday until it works? Thank

Re: Questions about PAPT and the uploading process

2010-01-09 Thread Umang
On 09/01/10 22:17, Vincent Bernat wrote: What message error did you get? This is the last part of the output from pbuilder. This doesn't happen with DIST=lenny or DIST=etch I: Configuring dpkg-dev... I: Configuring build-essential... I: Base system installed successfully. I: debootstrap

Re: Questions about PAPT and the uploading process

2010-01-10 Thread Umang
tarball for an older version of Ubuntu or Debian and update the tarball to the development version instead. Thank you, Umang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Questions about PAPT and the uploading process

2010-01-16 Thread Umang
On 14/01/10 01:48, Vincent Bernat wrote: You should try "chroot sid /usr/bin/apt-get" instead. Just tried that. I got this: $ sudo chroot sid /usr/bin/apt-get [sudo] password for umang: apt 0.7.25 for i386 compiled on Dec 15 2009 09:26:47 Usage: apt-get [options] command

Re: Questions about PAPT and the uploading process

2010-01-17 Thread Umang
I tried the updating etch to sid method. Here's what I got: sudo DIST=etch pbuilder update --override-config \ > --othermirror "deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian sid main" [sudo] password for umang: I: Upgrading for distribution etch I: Building the build Environment

Re: Questions about PAPT and the uploading process

2010-01-18 Thread Umang
tion there. Apologies again. Umang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

RFS: pynagram

2010-01-20 Thread Umang
Dear debian-python, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pynagram". * Package name: pynagram Version : 0.3.3-1 Upstream Author : Umang Varma * URL :https://launchpad.net/pynagram * License : GPLv3 Section : games It builds th

Re: Questions about PAPT and the uploading process

2010-01-20 Thread Umang
successfully. I'll try to find out why pbuilder didn't work soon. Thanks for all your help! Umang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Ideal directory structure?

2010-01-29 Thread Umang
d have the following line in my code: from foo include bar How do you structure your folders? Thanks Umang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Ideal directory structure?

2010-01-29 Thread Umang
m (clearly) not very experienced. Also, say I take Guy's suggestion, then what is the advantage of keep my executable in a bin/ directory when there is no conflict of file and directory names? Thank you, Umang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Re: Ideal directory structure?

2010-01-30 Thread Umang
, but not with setup.py install and ∴not in my debian package either. Extremely convenient. The initial discussion about Setuptools and autoconf went over my head. Maybe I'll come back to read that when I am more experienced. Thank you all, again! Umang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Ideal directory structure?

2010-01-30 Thread Umang
nto /usr instead of /usr/local ) Also, instead of search in your python code for where to find your other files, maybe do that work in a .sh file like Severin suggested? Umang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscr

Re: Ideal directory structure?

2010-01-30 Thread Umang
On 30/01/10 21:10, Guy Hulbert wrote: Why not just have foo.py then ? That would be too messy. For the one full package I've written in Python since I learned to code Python, there is a gui that manages everything that happens in the gui. However, the gui class itself requires uses two oth

Re: Ideal directory structure?

2010-01-31 Thread Umang
n somebody has done something that isn't mentioned in the one source I'd like to believe. It is clearly breaking official Python documentation. I've read a little about why this has been done (some archives of Matthias' mails), but all of it went over my head. Uman

Re: Ideal directory structure?

2010-01-31 Thread Umang
terfere with the one from Debian package. But I'll never find my data files in sys.prefix + path_i_asked_distutils_to_install_to. So what according to you, is the right way to go about distributing? This situation is definitely not ideal. Thanks Umang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Re: Ideal directory structure?

2010-01-31 Thread Umang
On 31/01/10 21:13, Barry Warsaw wrote: The Pythonic way (IMO) is to use pkg_resources: Great. So distutils is not sufficient to get everything done. I'm not a fan of complications, so I'm going to postpone that long read. For now at least. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ..

RFS: pynagram (updated package, 2nd attempt)

2010-02-03 Thread Umang
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pynagram". * Package name: pynagram Version : 0.3.4-1 Upstream Author : Umang Varma * URL : https://launchpad.net/pynagram * License : GNU GPLv3 Section : games It builds th

Re: RFS: pynagram (updated package, 2nd attempt)

2010-02-09 Thread Umang
On 03/02/10 22:11, Umang wrote: I would be very glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Jakub Wilk has done many thorough reviews of the package after each of my revisions and uploaded it. Thanks a lot, Jakub. :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Python Packaging Guide

2010-04-16 Thread Umang Varma
of course, I'd like to put the changes back on the Ubuntu Wiki. Thank you, Umang PS: If you are going to look at any diffs, you may like to start from rev 2 not 1 as rev 2 corresponds to rev 11 of the guide on the Ubuntu Team Wiki. I hadn't copied the correct revision of the o

Re: Python Packaging Guide

2010-04-17 Thread Umang Varma
eful when I looked that up. What confuses me is that the package in Debian depends only on python (that too >=2.3) and python-support. Would certainly be glad if you explain your reasons considering it to be a 'bad piece of documentation'. Thanks, Umang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Re: Python Packaging Guide

2010-04-17 Thread Umang Varma
On 18/04/10 10:58, Angel Abad wrote: Great work! I dont like much cdbs, but thanks for the effort Thanks. :) DktrKranz, themill and I had discussed neutrality. That line of discussion (looking at the IRC logs now) got lost somewhere so I eventually chose the middle path - presenting dh7

Re: Python Packaging Guide

2010-04-20 Thread Umang Varma
dh7. What you are saying is that the cdbs part should be deleted and what with dh7? Thanks, Umang PS: Jakub, I'm really sorry about the previous email. I completely forgot to click "Reply list". Apologies. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Re: RFS: python-pyftpdlib

2010-06-20 Thread Umang Varma
I'm not very experienced, so somethings in this mail may be factually *wrong*. Please correct anything in this mail that is wrong. On 06/21/2010 02:49 AM, Janos Guljas wrote: > RFS: python-pyftpdlib > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor my package "python-pyftpdlib". debian/watch: Ma

RFS: pynagram (updated package)

2011-06-13 Thread Umang Varma
his package for me. Kind regards Umang Varma -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4df6c7a8.3040...@gmail.com

Re: RFS: pynagram (updated package)

2011-06-23 Thread Umang Varma
On 06/13/2011 09:30 PM, Umang Varma wrote: > It builds these binary packages: > pynagram - anagram word game Since I haven't found a sponsor as yet, I just thought I would share some information about the package. Pynagram is an anagram word game this was written in Python and uses

RFS: pynagram (updated package, second attempt)

2011-07-15 Thread Umang Varma
under PAPT and would be glad to continue to do so. The packaging files are in PAPT's svn: svn://svn.debian.org/python-apps/packages/pynagram/trunk/ I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Umang Varma -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debia

Re: RFS: pynagram (updated package, second attempt)

2011-07-15 Thread Umang Varma
I am not dead, however. I recently fixed a bug [1] when I received an email about it. With this release, I updated the debian package to use newer packaging tools (`py_support` -> `dh_python2`; source format `1.0` -> `3.0 (quilt)`). Also, there is one open bug report [2] in the Ubuntu package.

Re: RFS: pynagram (updated package, second attempt)

2011-07-22 Thread Umang Varma
ccordingly. Thanks a lot! Umang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e29e4bc.4050...@gmail.com