Re: new dependencies for python-pint
Il 22/08/24 11:25, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: On 8/21/24 19:36, Antonio Valentino wrote: Dear Thomas, Il 21/08/24 09:20, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: On 8/21/24 08:07, Antonio Valentino wrote: flexparser has been accepted into unstable. cheers ACL granted. Thanks for your contrib. Thomas Goirand (zigo) Thanks a lot. Could you please do the same for python-pint. I have updated the dabian package to v0.24.3 (n git), but the upload fails. cheers Done. Considering the amount of (build-)depends, I'd suggest uploading to Experimental first, and then look at the excuse page for any breakage. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) Good idea indeed. The package is in experimental now. cheers -- Antonio Valentino
Re: new dependencies for python-pint
Dear Thomas, Il 21/08/24 09:20, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: On 8/21/24 08:07, Antonio Valentino wrote: flexparser has been accepted into unstable. cheers ACL granted. Thanks for your contrib. Thomas Goirand (zigo) Thanks a lot. Could you please do the same for python-pint. I have updated the dabian package to v0.24.3 (n git), but the upload fails. cheers -- Antonio Valentino
Re: new dependencies for python-pint
Dear Thomas, Il 15/08/24 09:33, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: On 8/15/24 08:10, Antonio Valentino wrote: Il 14/08/24 22:32, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: Hi, My answer below. On 8/12/24 08:04, Antonio Valentino wrote: Il 09/08/24 21:08, Antonio Valentino ha scritto: Dear Thomas, dear all, a new version (0.24.3) of python-pint is available upstream. It introduces two additional dependencies: flexcache and flexparser. I have files two ITP bugs: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078258 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078260 and prepared the debian packages in salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/flexparser https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/flexcache I uploaded both. Thanks for your contrib! Thanks you for uploading. Please do not forget to grant me upload rights as per [1] so that I can to future uploads by myself. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer#Granting_Permissions Will do when it clears the NEW queue (otherwise it wont work). Please ping me when the package does. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) flexparser has been accepted into unstable. cheers -- Antonio Valentino
Re: new dependencies for python-pint
Il 16/08/24 12:32, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: On 8/16/24 08:13, Antonio Valentino wrote: Dear Thomas, Il 15/08/24 09:33, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: On 8/15/24 08:10, Antonio Valentino wrote: Il 14/08/24 22:32, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: Hi, My answer below. On 8/12/24 08:04, Antonio Valentino wrote: Il 09/08/24 21:08, Antonio Valentino ha scritto: Dear Thomas, dear all, a new version (0.24.3) of python-pint is available upstream. It introduces two additional dependencies: flexcache and flexparser. I have files two ITP bugs: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078258 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078260 and prepared the debian packages in salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/flexparser https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/flexcache I uploaded both. Thanks for your contrib! Thanks you for uploading. Please do not forget to grant me upload rights as per [1] so that I can to future uploads by myself. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer#Granting_Permissions Will do when it clears the NEW queue (otherwise it wont work). Please ping me when the package does. flexcache has been accepted. Once I get upload permissions granted I will proceed with the source only upload. Unfortunately flexparser has bee rejected due to incomplete d/copyright file. I'm sorry for that. I have now fixed it in git and I kindly ask you to review/upload again. We have in git a debian/0.3.1-1 tag which is now updated. If you want I can have care of removing it. kind regards Package flexparser re-uploaded, and I also granted you upload rights for flexcache that was accepted. Thanks for your contribution, Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) Thanks again -- Antonio Valentino
Re: new dependencies for python-pint
Dear Thomas, Il 15/08/24 09:33, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: On 8/15/24 08:10, Antonio Valentino wrote: Il 14/08/24 22:32, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: Hi, My answer below. On 8/12/24 08:04, Antonio Valentino wrote: Il 09/08/24 21:08, Antonio Valentino ha scritto: Dear Thomas, dear all, a new version (0.24.3) of python-pint is available upstream. It introduces two additional dependencies: flexcache and flexparser. I have files two ITP bugs: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078258 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078260 and prepared the debian packages in salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/flexparser https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/flexcache I uploaded both. Thanks for your contrib! Thanks you for uploading. Please do not forget to grant me upload rights as per [1] so that I can to future uploads by myself. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer#Granting_Permissions Will do when it clears the NEW queue (otherwise it wont work). Please ping me when the package does. flexcache has been accepted. Once I get upload permissions granted I will proceed with the source only upload. Unfortunately flexparser has bee rejected due to incomplete d/copyright file. I'm sorry for that. I have now fixed it in git and I kindly ask you to review/upload again. We have in git a debian/0.3.1-1 tag which is now updated. If you want I can have care of removing it. kind regards -- Antonio Valentino
Re: new dependencies for python-pint
Il 14/08/24 22:32, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: Hi, My answer below. On 8/12/24 08:04, Antonio Valentino wrote: Il 09/08/24 21:08, Antonio Valentino ha scritto: Dear Thomas, dear all, a new version (0.24.3) of python-pint is available upstream. It introduces two additional dependencies: flexcache and flexparser. I have files two ITP bugs: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078258 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078260 and prepared the debian packages in salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/flexparser https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/flexcache I uploaded both. Thanks for your contrib! Thanks you for uploading. Please do not forget to grant me upload rights as per [1] so that I can to future uploads by myself. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer#Granting_Permissions If you agree I would like to maintain them under the debian-python team. I'm a DM so I can take in charge of the maintenance and normal uploads, but I cannot upload new packages. I kindly a DD to review and sponsor the initial upload of flexcache and flexparser. Package were ok, though I ran "wrap-and-sort -bastk" on both of them before uploading. I hope you're ok with this, I find it much more readable this way. sure cheers -- Antonio Valentino
Re: new dependencies for python-pint
kind reminder Il 09/08/24 21:08, Antonio Valentino ha scritto: Dear Thomas, dear all, a new version (0.24.3) of python-pint is available upstream. It introduces two additional dependencies: flexcache and flexparser. I have files two ITP bugs: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078258 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078260 and prepared the debian packages in salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/flexparser https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/flexcache If you agree I would like to maintain them under the debian-python team. I'm a DM so I can take in charge of the maintenance and normal uploads, but I cannot upload new packages. I kindly a DD to review and sponsor the initial upload of flexcache and flexparser. kind regards -- Antonio Valentino
new dependencies for python-ping
Dear Thomas, dear all, a new version (0.24.3) of python-pint is available upstream. It introduces two additional dependencies: flexcache and flexparser. I have files two ITP bugs: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078258 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078260 and prepared the debian packages in salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/flexparser https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/flexcache If you agree I would like to maintain them under the debian-python team. I'm a DM so I can take in charge of the maintenance and normal uploads, but I cannot upload new packages. I kindly a DD to review and sponsor the initial upload of flexcache and flexparser. kind regards -- Antonio Valentino
Re: Bug#1063957: python-pytest-lazy-fixture: autopkgtest regression with pytest 8
Dear Alexandre Il 14/05/24 08:47, Alexandre Detiste ha scritto: Le mar. 14 mai 2024 à 08:35, Julian Gilbey a écrit : On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 11:07:54PM +0200, Alexandre Detiste wrote: Le lun. 13 mai 2024 à 22:59, Scott Kitterman a écrit : I suggest that we soon ask ftpmaster to drop pytest-lazy-fixture from Debian unstable. Please transition all the rdepends first. Asking before that's done just creates more work for everyone. Scott K It looks like for this one package it's already clear. @Julian: here it looks you forgot to check build-depends: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067200 Oh, gosh, I thought I had done so (this is cython3-legacy), but I clearly made a serious mistake in my attempt! I made a mistake in my attempt too..., here's the real list: Maintainer: Sandro Tosi Package: prettytable Maintainer: Debian GIS Project -> CC'ing Antonio Package: pycoast Package: pyresample Thanks a lot. Yesterday I have uploaded the new version of pycoast and pyresample kind regards -- Antonio Valentino
Re: New upstream version for python-pint
Hi Thomas, Il 09/04/24 15:30, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: On 4/5/24 10:14, Antonio Valentino wrote: The change is already in salsa. Please Thomas, let me know if this is acceptable for you. Yeah, that's ok. Unfortunately the package is not currently buildable because of an update in python3-lxml that determined #1068349 [1] Please ping me when I can build the package. Thomas Goirand (zigo) The package now builds and it is ready for the upload. kind regards -- Antonio Valentino
Re: New upstream version for python-pint
Dear Alexandre, dear Thomas, Il 01/04/24 21:32, Alexandre Detiste ha scritto: I've packaged font-awesome5 at work, for sure it's not in Debian. The upgrade to v5 was rightfully reverted but it's in limbo since. https://packages.debian.org/sid/fonts-font-awesome fonts-font-awesome (5.0.10+really4.7.0~dfsg-4.1) <-- Please note that this package provides Font Awesome 4 (not Font Awesome 5 or Font Awesome 6 which are different fonts with different licensing). Thanks for the info. Le lun. 1 avr. 2024 à 21:26, Antonio Valentino a écrit : Dear Thomas, Il 01/04/24 17:52, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: On 3/31/24 21:05, Antonio Valentino wrote: Dear Thomas, Il 30/03/24 22:25, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: On 3/29/24 15:13, Antonio Valentino wrote: Dear Thomas and Ondřej, a couple of packages that I maintain are impacted by an RC bug in python-pint (#1067318). I think that an update to the to the latest pint version 0.23 should be sufficient to fix the issue. If you agree, I would like prepare the package for the new upstream version in the salsa. Of course I will let to you the review and upload. Please let me know, kind regards Please go ahead and feel free to add yourself as uploader. Thomas Thanks Thomas The packages is now updated in salsa. Unfortunately the reprotest job fails in CI, but I'm not able to reproduce on my laptop and it seems not to be a regression. I will try to fix it in future uploads but for the moment I would prefer to have an upload to fix a couple of RC bugs. Could you please review and upload? I have also put myself as uploader. I'm a DM so I kindly ask you to grant me upload permissions as described in [3]. kind regards Hi! Thanks for the work Antonio. 1/ In the clean target, please also clean: - Pint.egg-info - docs/savefig 2/ There's a typo in d/changelog, you wrote: "d/copuright". 3/ I'm really not sure about the python-pint-doc.lintian-overrides overriding "font-in-non-font-package". Can't you use the fonts from system instead? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) 1/ and 2/ are now fixed For 3/ I indeed did a quick search but I was not able to find a font package providing the needed fonts $ apt-file search fa-brands-400.ttf gnunet: /usr/share/doc/gnunet/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/6.1.2/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz icinga-php-library: [CUT] Maybe node-fortawesome-fontawesome-free, but the version seems not to be the same. Actually I'm not really sure where these fonts are collected during the build process. Do you have any hint? Ok, I think that the most convenient solution at the moment is to replace the vendored fonts with the ones provided by the python3-pydata-sphinx-theme package. This is not ideal because python3-pydata-sphinx-theme vendors the fonts itself but at least we avoid duplications. The change is already in salsa. Please Thomas, let me know if this is acceptable for you. Unfortunately the package is not currently buildable because of an update in python3-lxml that determined #1068349 [1] [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068349 kind regards -- Antonio Valentino
Re: New upstream version for python-pint
Dear Thomas, Il 01/04/24 17:52, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: On 3/31/24 21:05, Antonio Valentino wrote: Dear Thomas, Il 30/03/24 22:25, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: On 3/29/24 15:13, Antonio Valentino wrote: Dear Thomas and Ondřej, a couple of packages that I maintain are impacted by an RC bug in python-pint (#1067318). I think that an update to the to the latest pint version 0.23 should be sufficient to fix the issue. If you agree, I would like prepare the package for the new upstream version in the salsa. Of course I will let to you the review and upload. Please let me know, kind regards Please go ahead and feel free to add yourself as uploader. Thomas Thanks Thomas The packages is now updated in salsa. Unfortunately the reprotest job fails in CI, but I'm not able to reproduce on my laptop and it seems not to be a regression. I will try to fix it in future uploads but for the moment I would prefer to have an upload to fix a couple of RC bugs. Could you please review and upload? I have also put myself as uploader. I'm a DM so I kindly ask you to grant me upload permissions as described in [3]. kind regards Hi! Thanks for the work Antonio. 1/ In the clean target, please also clean: - Pint.egg-info - docs/savefig 2/ There's a typo in d/changelog, you wrote: "d/copuright". 3/ I'm really not sure about the python-pint-doc.lintian-overrides overriding "font-in-non-font-package". Can't you use the fonts from system instead? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) 1/ and 2/ are now fixed For 3/ I indeed did a quick search but I was not able to find a font package providing the needed fonts $ apt-file search fa-brands-400.ttf gnunet: /usr/share/doc/gnunet/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/6.1.2/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz icinga-php-library: /usr/share/icinga-php/ipl/asset/static/font/awesome/fa-brands-400.ttf node-fortawesome-fontawesome-free: /usr/share/nodejs/@fortawesome/fontawesome-free/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf ntopng-data: /usr/share/ntopng/httpdocs/fontawesome-free-5.11.2-web/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf omnidb-common: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/OmniDB_app/static/OmniDB_app/lib/fa/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf petsc3.18-doc: /usr/share/doc/petsc3.18-doc/docs/_static/vendor/fontawesome/6.1.2/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz petsc3.19-doc: /usr/share/doc/petsc3.19-doc/docs/_static/vendor/fontawesome/6.1.2/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-astroplan-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-astroplan-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-astropy-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-astropy-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-blosc-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-blosc-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-cogent-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-cogent-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-dask-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-dask-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-distributed-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-distributed-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-django-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-django-doc/html/_static/fontawesome/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-h5netcdf-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-h5netcdf-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-imageio-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-imageio-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-md-toc-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-md-toc-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-mpl-sphinx-theme-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-mpl-sphinx-theme-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-nbformat-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-nbformat-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-pandas-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-pandas-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-pyqtgraph-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-pyqtgraph-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-pystac-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-pystac-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-scipy-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-scipy-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-silx-doc: /usr/share/doc/python3-silx/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-skimage-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-skimage-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-sphinx-copybutton-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-sphinx-copybutton-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-terminado-doc: /usr/share/doc/python-terminado-doc/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/5.13.0/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz python-traitlets-doc: /usr/share/doc/pyth
Re: New upstream version for python-pint
forgot the link [3] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer#Granting_Permissions cheers Il 31/03/24 21:05, Antonio Valentino ha scritto: Dear Thomas, Il 30/03/24 22:25, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: On 3/29/24 15:13, Antonio Valentino wrote: Dear Thomas and Ondřej, a couple of packages that I maintain are impacted by an RC bug in python-pint (#1067318). I think that an update to the to the latest pint version 0.23 should be sufficient to fix the issue. If you agree, I would like prepare the package for the new upstream version in the salsa. Of course I will let to you the review and upload. Please let me know, kind regards Please go ahead and feel free to add yourself as uploader. Thomas Thanks Thomas The packages is now updated in salsa. Unfortunately the reprotest job fails in CI, but I'm not able to reproduce on my laptop and it seems not to be a regression. I will try to fix it in future uploads but for the moment I would prefer to have an upload to fix a couple of RC bugs. Could you please review and upload? I have also put myself as uploader. I'm a DM so I kindly ask you to grant me upload permissions as described in [3]. kind regards -- Antonio Valentino
Re: New upstream version for python-pint
Dear Thomas, Il 30/03/24 22:25, Thomas Goirand ha scritto: On 3/29/24 15:13, Antonio Valentino wrote: Dear Thomas and Ondřej, a couple of packages that I maintain are impacted by an RC bug in python-pint (#1067318). I think that an update to the to the latest pint version 0.23 should be sufficient to fix the issue. If you agree, I would like prepare the package for the new upstream version in the salsa. Of course I will let to you the review and upload. Please let me know, kind regards Please go ahead and feel free to add yourself as uploader. Thomas Thanks Thomas The packages is now updated in salsa. Unfortunately the reprotest job fails in CI, but I'm not able to reproduce on my laptop and it seems not to be a regression. I will try to fix it in future uploads but for the moment I would prefer to have an upload to fix a couple of RC bugs. Could you please review and upload? I have also put myself as uploader. I'm a DM so I kindly ask you to grant me upload permissions as described in [3]. kind regards -- Antonio Valentino
New upstream version for python-pint
Dear Thomas and Ondřej, a couple of packages that I maintain are impacted by an RC bug in python-pint (#1067318). I think that an update to the to the latest pint version 0.23 should be sufficient to fix the issue. If you agree, I would like prepare the package for the new upstream version in the salsa. Of course I will let to you the review and upload. Please let me know, kind regards -- Antonio Valentino
Re: Joining the team
Hi Sebastiaan, Il 23/12/22 14:16, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto: Please add sebastic to the team on Salsa, I'd like to help by pushing commits for packages maintained in the team that are part of the dependency chain of the packages I help maintain. Case in point: python-numpy-groupies (#1026885) I have read and accept the team policy. Kind Regards, Bas I have some work done for numpy_groupies in https://salsa.debian.org/antonio.valentino/numpy-groupies. cheers -- Antonio Valentino
Re: python-attrs update
Dear Timo, Il 09/08/22 20:17, Timo Röhling ha scritto: Hi Antonio, * Antonio Valentino [2022-08-09 18:31]: I have prepare an updated version of the package python-atts. The code is in my fork on salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/antonio.valentino/python-attrs [...] I kindly ask to someone in debian-python to review the changes and upload the new version of the package. 1. This is a "Team upload", not a "Non-maintainer upload" 2. The copyright holder "Hynek Schlawack" is duplicated in d/copyright Other than that, the packaging looks good and I'll gladly upload it for you. Feel free to commit to the main repository. Cheers Timo Thanks a lot Timo. I have just pushed to the main repository all the updates, including the small changes that you requested. Please feel free to go on with he upload. Kind regards -- Antonio Valentino
python-attrs update
Dear all, I have prepare an updated version of the package python-atts. The code is in my fork on salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/antonio.valentino/python-attrs I have also created a merge request on salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-attrs/-/merge_requests/2 The latest upstream version of python-attrs is needed by a new package (sarsen) that I'm working on. It will be include in Debian GIS. I kindly ask to someone in debian-python to review the changes and upload the new version of the package. kind regards -- Antonio Valentino
Re: [RFS] python3-resampy -- module for efficient signal resampling
Dear David, a very long time is passed since our last discussion. Are you still interested in having this package in debian? I would really appreciate if you could sponsor the initial upload. kind regards antonio Il 29/08/20 18:28, Antonio Valentino ha scritto: Dear developers, I set-up the python package for resampy on salsa [1]. The package closes the ITP #968469 [2]. I kindly ask a member of the team to review it and sponsor the upload. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/resampy [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=%23968469 kind regards -- Antonio Valentino
[RFS] python3-resampy -- module for efficient signal resampling
Dear developers, I set-up the python package for resampy on salsa [1]. The package closes the ITP #968469 [2]. I kindly ask a member of the team to review it and sponsor the upload. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/resampy [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=%23968469 kind regards -- Antonio Valentino
Re: Request to join the DPMT
Thank you very much Ondrej. Il 26/08/20 09:09, Ondrej Novy ha scritto: > Hi, > > ne 23. 8. 2020 v 8:24 odesílatel Antonio Valentino < > antonio.valent...@tiscali.it> napsal: > >> Hello, >> I would like to prepare and maintain the python package for resampy [1, >> 2] within the Debian Python Modules Team. >> > > welcome :) > -- Antonio Valentino
Request to join the DPMT
Hello, I would like to prepare and maintain the python package for resampy [1, 2] within the Debian Python Modules Team. I currently maintain other python packages in other teams but I'm not a DD/DM so I will need someone to sponsor uploads. My user ID on salsa is antonio.valentino. I have read the team policy [3] and I accept it. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968469 [2] https://salsa.debian.org/antonio.valentino/resampy [3] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/policy.rst kind regards -- Antonio Valentino
New upstream version for Mako
Dear Piotr, dear all, mako v1.0.7 (the one currently in sid [1]) is incompatible with Python 3.8 [2]. I prepared an updated version of the package including an update to the latest upstream version and also fixes for the RC bug #944705 [1], and also bugs #936985 (Drop Python 2 support) [4], #917043, 877280, #917044 and #722265. As far as I can understand bug #917045 has been already fixed in the past, so probably it can be closed. The update version can be found on my personal fork on salsa [3]. I know that you are very busy in this period but I hope that Piotr or someone in the DPMT can find the time to review the package and sponsor an upload (I'm not a DD/DM I'm not currently a member of the DPMT). Please let me know If I can do something else to help with mako. [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/mako [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944705 [3] https://salsa.debian.org/a_valentino-guest/mako [4] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936985 kind regards -- Antonio Valentino
Re: policy for source package names
Hi Vincent, Il 05/08/2014 00:04, Vincent Cheng ha scritto: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Antonio Valentino > wrote: >> Hi list, >> I read in [1] and [2] that binary packages with public modules should >> have the python- (or python3-) prefix in the name. >> I'm wondering if the same naming rules should be used for source packages. >> >> I'm preparing some new packages so I would like to be sure I'm using the >> correct naming before the first upload. >> > > AFAIK, no, there aren't any hard and fast rules regarding source > package names. In fact, I don't think there are any rules at all; just > don't pick a source package name that's already taken, and pick one > that is relevant to your package (if you take a look at existing DPMT > packages [1], most of them either use their module name, or prefix it > with python-). > > Regards, > Vincent > > [1] > https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > tanks a lot -- Antonio Valentino -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53e0051...@tiscali.it
policy for source package names
Hi list, I read in [1] and [2] that binary packages with public modules should have the python- (or python3-) prefix in the name. I'm wondering if the same naming rules should be used for source packages. I'm preparing some new packages so I would like to be sure I'm using the correct naming before the first upload. thanks [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Python/Packaging [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ -- Antonio Valentino -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53dff871.9030...@tiscali.it
