, people can either use the complete Zope packge
or simpleTAL.
Any opinions?
Ciao,
- --
.~.Bastian Kleineidam . calvin (at) debian.org
/V\
/( )\ GnuPG Schlssel http://kampfwurst.net/gpgkey.txt
^^-^^
F: Was hat vier Beine und einen Arm?
A: Ein glcklicher Pitbull-Terrier
-BEGIN PGP
to the Debian information
djungle 8)
ciao, Bastian
- --
.~.Bastian Kleineidam . calvin (at) debian.org
/V\
/( )\ GnuPG Schlüssel http://kampfwurst.net/gpgkey.txt
^^-^^
Oh no! Not the magnet!
- Bender
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 10:26:57AM +0200, Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
* file a bug report against the python packages, requesting a
python-doc-tools package to be added to the debian archive
I'suggest not a new package, but inclusion in pythonX.Y-doc.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 12:25:08PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:22:11 +0200
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
file:///usr/share/doc/python/python-policy.txt.gz (that is shipped
with the python package).
pythoncard version to use for the samples.
python2.2-pythoncard Depends: python2.2
python2.3-pythoncard Depends: python2.3
pythoncard-doc Depends: python2.2-pythoncard | python2.3-pythoncard
Greetings,
- --
Bastian Kleineidam
Atombombe · Plutonium · Fat Man · Do it Yourself · Tim Taylor
- --
Bastian Kleineidam
Atombombe Plutonium Fat Man Do it Yourself Tim Taylor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+MBnOeBwlBDLsbz4RAvkdAKDJwrV2OBbeoaO4jkKYNlsCfPapeQCeMa/x
KjqJsBk60KpWPQ2GL/nstRI=
=DgqG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
=mailman.1041875417.12807.clpa-moderators%40python.org
I suggest to disable the above two modules in python2.2 (which is in
woody), even if existing applications can break. What do you think?
Cheers, Bastian
- --
Bastian Kleineidam
Atombombe Plutonium Fat Man Do it Yourself Tim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:55:36PM +0200, Kai Hendry wrote:
test.py is:
import re
p = re.compile('[a-z]+')
print p
The first error message is from python2.1, python2.2 and last
python2.3 from SID.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ vim test.py
, but can do it manually if this is a problem.
Dont code anything like that. I'd rather fix those hacky'ish packages
which try to append something to sys.path.
Cheers,
Bastian
--
Bastian Kleineidam
reflexionsniveau AT web.de
calvin AT users.sf.net
calvin AT debian.org
pgpG7b6H6swnL.pgp
wanted to let you know that python-register can even be used for mailman.
cu, Bastian
--
Bastian Kleineidam
reflexionsniveau AT web.de
calvin AT users.sf.net
calvin AT debian.org
pgpTUg90KUxD0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
of .py[co] files
* add a new command python-compile to compile single python
files
* Added a separate section in python-register.1 for python programs;
also give an example.
-- Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 13 Sep 2002 22:17:45 +0200
cu,
Bastian
--
Bastian Kleineidam
and
use-cases.
cu, Bastian
--
Bastian Kleineidam
reflexionsniveau AT web.de
calvin AT users.sf.net
calvin AT debian.org
pgpcTbxIp8fVL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
on the
required python versions.
If I understand you, python-numeric should have
Depends: python, python2.2-numeric
This wont work for python != 2.2.
Cheers, Bastian
--
Bastian Kleineidam
reflexionsniveau AT web.de
calvin AT users.sf.net
calvin AT debian.org
pgp3UTHPWT9mO.pgp
Description: PGP
their stuff in /usr/share/package/
or /usr/lib/package and use their own Python-version-compile
script, but then they are on their own.
cu,
--
Bastian Kleineidam
reflexionsniveau AT web.de
calvin AT users.sf.net
calvin AT debian.org
pgptPkq1aVP47.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 11:29:12PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
what is python-central?
See http://people.debian.org/~calvin/python-central/
doko wanted to include the script into the upcoming Python
releases, which I think is the best way to spread this.
Cheers,
--
Bastian Kleineidam · [EMAIL
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 03:26:00PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Any reason to keep 2.1 ?
It would make the transition somewhat easier for NMUs, as you
would only have to update the dependencies.
Tschööö, Bastian
--
Bastian Kleineidam · [EMAIL PROTECTED] · GPG key ID 32EC6F3E
pgp3TDIVlrPB5
or
not.
Roughly 5 people and a month or two's work should cover it.
I filed a feature request at SF.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=574465group_id=5470atid=355470
Greetings,
--
.~.
/V\ Bastian Kleineidam · Unleash the power. Use Linux
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:09:43PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
Do you think there would be opposition to using say docbook?
Lets find out.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=574465group_id=5470atid=355470
Greetings,
--
.~.
/V\ Bastian Kleineidam · Just
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 12:07:43PM +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which python2.1 do you have? It is the same in woody and sid (2.1.3-3)
and doesn't seem to contain such a file:
python2.1 (2.1.3-3) from sid
py2texi.el is a generated file
Hi,
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 10:26:41AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
For those that _really_ want to run foo with python2.2, they can run
'foo-python2.2' instead. I think using 'alternatives' is overkill for this
reason, and the symlink is a good idea.
'python2.2 /usr/bin/foo' would work too.
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 01:09:02PM -, Moshe Zadka wrote:
Situation:
python2.1, python2.2, python2.2-foo and python-foo are all installed.
python2.1 is the default.
All dependancies are resolved, right?
#!/usr/bin/python
import foo
equivalent to
#!/usr/bin/python2.1
import foo
Hi Donovan,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:38:17AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
Did you see my analysis and modified register-python-package script? I
posted it under a misleading subject by mistake (responded to another thread
that migrated onto it).
Sorry, sometimes I have lag in responding :)
, not in
/usr/lib/python/
* display usage for wrong or missing options
* man page updated
-- Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 14 Feb 2002 13:33:52 +0100
pgphArxZdh8qL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 07:41:31PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
I have a suggestion, which may already have been thought of.
For Python Policy 2.2.3, see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2002/debian-python-200201/msg00019.html
I am working on this. I have the previous version online at
Hello.
The first version of the python-central package is online at
http://people.debian.org/~calvin/python-central/
It provides support for installing pure Python modules independent
of the Python version (see Python Policy 2.2.3).
I made a patch for the python1.5 package which uses this
Hello Pythoneers,
another version of the dh_purepython script is online at
http://people.debian.org/~calvin/purepython/.
It provides support for Section 2.2.3 of the Python Policy
which adresses version-independent Python modules.
I would be pleased to hear any comments and/or suggestions from
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 09:28:30PM +0300, Mikhail Sobolev wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 06:29:58PM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 05:25:43PM +, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
on alpha debian, python 2.1.1-8:
Works for me, no aborts. (i386, python 2.1.1-8)
Just
Hi Python folks,
I have put together a dh_purepython debhelper script to help
the installation of pure Python packages.
Still missing:
1) All Python X.Y versions need to be preinstalled. What happens
when you install an new Python version? Hmm, we have to
register those pure python
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 05:25:43PM +, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
Greetings,
on alpha debian, python 2.1.1-8:
import math
math.exp(-720)
aborts the interpreter with a floating point exception. The strange thing
is, exp(-700) and exp(-750) both work.
Works for me, no aborts.
Hi,
because my old GPG key expired and the new one looks to
take a while to get in the keyring I wanted to ask if
someone can sponsor an upload of a new linkchecker release.
You will find the new linkchecker 1.3.13 package at
http://people.debian.org/~calvin/debian/
The linkchecker*.changes
Hi.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:14:46PM -0600, Joe Reinhardt wrote:
What is the best way to use the setup.py in the debian/rules?
Added lines marked with +++
+++ PYTHON=python2.1
+++ PACKAGE=scipy
configure: configure-stamp
configure-stamp:
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to
Hi.
Harry Henry Gebel wrote:
'Depends: python (= 2.1), python ( 2.2)' as an error; so I used
'Depends: python (= 2.1)' and 'Conflicts: python (= 2.2)'
No, this is not equivalent! The Conflict means that I cannot install
happydoc and python2.2 simultaneously, and this is not desired.
I know the
Jérôme Marant wrote:
I said previously that the upgrade when OK. This is true, but I hadn't look
further at that moment.
My upgrade had some errors:
File /usr/lib/python2.1/test/nocaret.py, line 2
[x for x in x] = x
SyntaxError: can't assign to list comprehension
SyntaxError: from
Anthony Roach wrote:
So when there is a Debian package for Python 2.1, will I have to have a
python21-scons that depends on python 2.2, python = 2.1? I'm assuming I do,
because Python 2.1 will use /usr/lib/python2.1 rather than
/usr/lib/python2.0.
Exactly. With Python 2.1 you will have to make a
will run into problems sooner or later and you have to
update your software as the internal format changes. You can look
at the discussions about bdist_rpm and the RPM versions, thats
pretty much the same.
Bastian Kleineidam
35 matches
Mail list logo
