Re: [MBF] pybuild: Stop calling setup.py test?

ed, or would it be possible to do this mass bug-filing at sub-RC level so that there's a convenient list in the BTS? Thanks, -- Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]

Bug#1025841: RM: lazr.smtptest -- ROM; broken with Python 3.10, superseded by python3-aiosmtpd, no rdeps

ell, all that technology is old and cruft, and we have shiny new goodness in aiosmtpd. Rather than bringing it up to date, presumably as a wrapper around aiosmtpd, I think it's better to declare this package abandoned and remove it from Debian. Thanks, -- Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]

Re: Help needed with src:pkg click when building against Python 3.10

. This is a very complicated way to write `sys.version_info >= (3, 2)` though! -- Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]

Request to join DPMT

help with maintaining the packages as well. My Alioth login is 'cjwatson'. I have read https://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/policy.html and I accept it. Thanks, -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[PATCH] Support :any architecture qualifiers for multiarch

x27;, '', 'phpldapadmin (<= 1.0~)', '', [], []], +packages = {'phpldapadmin': ['1.0', 'web', 'phpldapadmin', '1.0', 'all', None, '', 'apache2 (>= 2.0)', '', '', [], []

Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?

lude socket support. Socket support does seem to be there: $ dpkg -c /mirror/ubuntu/pool/main/p/python2.4/python2.4-minimal_2.4.2-1ubuntu2_i386.deb | grep socket -rw-r--r-- root/root 49608 2006-01-17 12:59:02 ./usr/lib/python2.4/lib-dynload/_socket.so

Python 2.3 transition completed in testing

kages that had been broken became newly installable due to this change that a single new uninstallable package could be tolerated. Once the release-critical bugs affecting it are fixed, python-ldap can move in in its own time. (Phew!) Cheers, -- Colin Watson [

Re: Summary of python transition problems

On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 07:28:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Colin Watson writes: > > For what it's worth, I think a python-defaults source package or some > > such would help: at the moment there are several packages needlessly > > stalled on python2.3, even tho

Re: Summary of python transition problems

u know there was a particular version of pythonX.Y that your package > doesn't work with. The versioned dependency is probably generated automatically by dpkg-shlibdeps: $ cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/python2.3.shlibs libpython2.3 1.0 python2.3 (>= 2.3) I assume that this means binaries

Re: Python transition

version of python2.3 in testing, so if people can please have patience until Wednesday, we can get testing updated and then go on with our lives. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Status of python packages (20031010)

me is too difficult at the moment. Anthony? The remaining buggy packages are cyrus-sasl2, heimdal, and pyddr. I'll file an actual bug on pyddr tomorrow if nobody beats me to it. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Summary of python transition problems

s needlessly stalled on python2.3, even though their dependencies are simply 'python2.3 (>= 2.3)' or similar. If the python binary package were built from a separate source package then we could decouple transitions from the task of keeping the versioned packages up to date. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Summary of python transition problems

On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 12:25:29PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote: > On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 06:50, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Colin Watson writes: > > > While this would probably help users, it won't make the transition > > > easier as far as testing is concerne

Re: Summary of python transition problems

On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:48:11PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Colin Watson writes: > > Buggy packages > > == > > gnue-* is missing here. No; gnue-common in testing depended on python2.1, not python. The version in unstable should certainly be fixed, bu

Re: Summary of python transition problems

On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 03:21:42PM -, Alastair wrote: > From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Missing builds > > == > > > > * newt: hppa > > Is this an error /out of date? From the archive, > it appears that hppa is up-to-date on ne

Re: Summary of python transition problems

complete so that we have something more or less releaseable first? -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Summary of python transition problems

On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:16:37PM +0100, Mikhail Sobolev wrote: > is libmetakit-python missing from this list for a reason? It depends on python2.2, which isn't a problem as far as testing's concerned. Packages depending on 'python (>= 2.2), python (<< 2.3)' ar

Summary of python transition problems

g and so on. It would be helpful if we could regard Python packages as being in a mini-freeze for the moment, with RC bug fixes only; having to wait for lots of 10-day testing delays is going to be a pain otherwise. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#170939: RFA: linbot -- WWW site link checker

: extra Section: web Installed-Size: 316 Maintainer: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: all Version: 1.0.0-8 Depends: python (>= 2.2), python (<< 2.3) Suggests: www-browser, httpd Filename: pool/main/l/linbot/linbot_1.0.0-8_all.deb Size: 66042 MD5sum: 4407d81a7c9757feb401d156

Re: Problems with new policy

ordination from upstream, or being able to use a single libsip. I agree that it's ugly, though. Do libsip upstream set any sonames? Is it important that binaries linked against it on Debian can be run on other distributions? -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]