Re: Moving from appdirs to platformdirs

+1 در ۲۱ ژوئن ۲۰۲۳ ۱۲:۴۱:۵۲ (UTC)، Scott Kitterman نوشت: >It would be nice if we could reduce/eliminate use of appdirs during the Trixie >development cycle. It's unmaintained and superseded by platformdirs. As far >as I can tell, platformdirs is API compatible with appdirs, except the import

Re: Siging up for the Contribution on Python Packaging for Debian

Hey, File an ITP bug for it against wnpp pseudo package and start to package it on https://mentors.debian.org Ask here after you filed the RFS. Sincerely در ۲۵ مهٔ ۲۰۲۳ ۱۲:۱۹:۰۰ (UTC)، TopologicRose نوشت: >Hi, >want to contribute a Python package which called pyvis

Adopting python-fire

Dear team. I adopted python-fire package which was orphaned before since my own package is depending on it. I uploaded it on mentors and gitlab. So I am looking for a sponsor for it: * Package name : python-fire    Version : 0.5.0-2] * URL : https://github.com/google/python-fire * License :

Re: #!/usr/bin/python3 vs virtualenv

You just want to install sphinx via pip in the virtual environment too. Each venv should be atomic and isolated which means not depended to system packages.

Re: Python 3.10 in bookworm

Does it worth trying to package pyenv for Debian? Ain't it against any rules?

Re: How do you create entry-points for Python applications?

> The only package I maintain that I can think of at the moment with > entrypoints and project.toml is too complicated to be a good example. That shouldn't be so much different from setup.py projects and there are plenty of them in archive.

Re: How do you create entry-points for Python applications?

AFAIK Debian helper for Python handles this در 18 دسامبر 2022 19:18:44 (UTC)، c.bu...@posteo.jp نوشت: >Hello, >a python application isn't a binary but a script. So to invoke such an >application there need to be a shell script somewhere in PATH that invoke that >script via python3 interpreter.