--Phillip == Phillip J Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(btw Phillip, thanks muchly for your patience with this thread)
Phillip If you unpack this as-is, but rename EGG-INFO to
Phillip foobar.egg-info (today) or foobar-1.2.egg-info (when I
Phillip release 0.6a9 of setuptools), and the whole
--Phillip == Phillip J Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Phillip Python developers would *love* to have Debian manage their
Phillip packages, they would simply like to be able to verify at
Phillip runtime that the management has in fact been done. It's not
Phillip that we don't trust you,
--Paul == Paul Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My point to David was simply that egg packaging in the .egg form is
more akin to Stow than to CPAN, so most of the flaws of CPAN are
not applicable to them.
Paul Sorry, I don't know what Stow is, so that doesn't clarify things
Paul to
--Phillip == Phillip J Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Phillip This is a major advantage over developers who do not do this,
Phillip not only in developer effectivness, but also because a
Phillip developer who depends exclusively on a specific packaging
Phillip system will not have the same
4 matches
Mail list logo
