Re: Bug#928394: RFS: freetype-py/2.1.0.post1-1 [ITP]
[2019-05-03 17:18] Bastian Germann > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freetype-py". This closes a > very long-standing wnpp issue. I posted an earlier version last > September but got no attention so far. > > * Package name: freetype-py >Version : 2.1.0.post1-1 >Upstream Author : Nicolas P. Rougier > * URL : https://github.com/rougier/freetype-py > * License : BSD >Section : python > > It builds those binary packages: > > python3-freetype - Freetype Python bindings for Python 3 Here what I found interesting: * Lintian complains about "font-in-non-font-package" and "font-outside-font-dir". Why do you ship .ttf font in examples directory? * Policy is slightly outdated. * In debian rules, instead of "cat PKG-INFO | sed ..." you can use $DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM. See /usr/share/dpkg/pkg-info.mk. By the way, it is useless-use-of-cat. * You can use B-D: debhelper-compat (= 11). Why not 12, by the way? -- Note, that I send and fetch email in batch, once every 24 hours. If matter is urgent, try https://t.me/kaction --
Re: Bug#816004: RFS: [ITP] python-nameparser/0.3.11-1
[2016-02-26 15:34] Edward Betts > > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-nameparser" > > * Package name: python-nameparser >Version : 0.3.11 >Upstream Author : Derek Gulbranson > * URL : https://github.com/derek73/python-nameparser > * License : LGPL-2.1+ >Section : python [I am no DD] In Description: of python3-nameparser last line: This package contains fuzzywuzzy for Python3. ^^ What is that? -- Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff Accept-Language: eo,en,ru X-Keep-In-CC: yes X-Web-Site: sinsekvu.github.io
[federico.cera...@gmail.com: Bug#771683: python-pygithub: Conflicts with github-cli]
Hello! I attached a bug report and would like to ask you to rename this `github` directory, since renaming application internals would create less havoc, than renaming library public module. Also, please evaluate difference between cligh and github-cli. On glance it seems, that cligh(I maintain it) is more generic. * * * * To @debian-python: I sent this message two weeks ago or so privately to maintainer, and did not received response. Either it got lost(so now it have second chance), either maintainer is too busy, in which case I would like to ask team to take action instead. Another option would be just add `Conflicts`, but I find it unreasonable. -- Best regards, Dmitry Bogatov , Free Software supporter, esperantisto and netiquette guardian. GPG: 54B7F00D --- Begin Message --- Package: python-pygithub Severity: normal Hi and thank you for packaging Pygithub The package conflicts with https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/github-cli They are both using the same "github" namespace: /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/github/ -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Federico --- End Message --- pgpsXpykEy8hA.pgp Description: PGP signature
