On 2019-11-14 00:24:15, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 03:31:04PM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > On 2019-11-13 15:06:54, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > > On 11/12/19 4:37 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > > The related binary packages are available in 2 binary names
On 2019-11-13 15:06:54, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 11/12/19 4:37 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > The related binary packages are available in 2 binary names (depending on
> > release)
> > getmail4 (version=4,5) popcon installed ~2000
> > getmail (version=3,5) popcon installed ~1000
> >
> >
On 2016-04-22 19:36:12, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 22.04.2016 16:58, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Now that debug symbols are automatically generated in -dbgsym packages,
> > how do you handle the debug
> > /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/.x86_64-linux-gnu_d.so files?
> >
>
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:02:30PM +0200, Tim Michelsen wrote:
Hello,
is there any recipe/snippet for how to install or treat a sphinx
based python package documentation in debian/rules?
Hi,
Have you looked at dh_sphinxdoc?
regards,
iustin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:56:02AM +0100, Suno Ano wrote:
Barry We had a report in upstream Python from a user who was trying to
Barry find information about dist-packages. He did a Google search and
Barry didn't find any definitive official explanation of this
Barry Debuntuism. His
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:38:11PM +0200, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:01 PM, W. Martin Borgert deba...@debian.org
wrote:
Quoting anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
python-support README [1] contains different instructions for
'arch-all' and 'arch-any'
as a sponsor ? I offered
him to do so, but I'm not *that* python interested, and someone more
involved with python would surely be better.
That would be great, indeed.
Thanks,
Iustin Pop
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
. However, I've been unable to find a sponsor.
Regards,
Iustin Pop
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 01:38:43PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
I've already re-built these two packages, removing 2.1 and 2.2 support
and adding 2.4. However, I've been unable to find a sponsor.
Thanks everyone for the suggestions. Will update the bug reports later
today with the relevant
9 matches
Mail list logo