Request to join Python team on Salsa

the original author of Pygopherd, and it is now compatible with Python 3. I would like to re-introduce it to Debian, as part of the team. Thanks, John

Re: Moving off of git-dpm

On 16 February 2017 at 11:31, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > Are you guys seriously considering dgit to replace anything other than > dput in DPMT? I'd rather go back to svn-buildpackage than use something > that will not allow me (f.e. as sponsor) to review before uploading! One can

Re: Package name for github.com/miguelgrinberg/python-socketio

on details are different. Which could actually be a good thing, as the main "socketio" author isn't currently maintaining their package: https://github.com/abourget/gevent-socketio/commit/1c84627980c0b77f8f9005fdbcc916ca33d0e4d1 -- John Vandenberg

Re: pybuild sphinxdoc and extensions

i knew it! there are three identical twins of Piotr. No wonder they get so much done! On 23 October 2015 at 15:22, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > [Piotr Ożarowski, 2015-10-23] >> [Piotr Ożarowski, 2015-10-23] >> > override_dh_auto_build: >> > dh_auto_build >> >

Re: admins elections

On 1 October 2015 at 19:44, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > [Barry Warsaw, 2015-10-01] > > Team members can have more of a say --and more confidence in-- how the team > > is > > run. If you elect someone to a leadership role, you're giving your support > > to > > them to make the

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

On 30 September 2015 at 10:26, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, at 01:53 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> This has driven >> some contributors away in the past, thinking we don't have team spirit. >> IMO, that's truth, and this kind of thread is hurting again. > >

Re: pybuild and proxies -- could we make prohibition optional?

On 27 July 2015 at 21:31, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote: I already followed Dimitri's suggestion to add no_proxy=localhost and will add your PYBUILD_FAKE_PROXY later today awesome! feel free to tune the name to whatever you feel more appropriate. I simply do not forward empty

Re: pybuild and proxies -- could we make prohibition optional?

On 21 July 2015 at 20:17, Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com wrote: talking about this ;-) : $ grep -A3 http_proxy pybuild if 'http_proxy' not in env: env['http_proxy'] = 'http://127.0.0.1:9/' if 'https_proxy' not in env: env['https_proxy'] =

Re: -nspkg.pth and .pth files - should we get rid of them?

On 20 July 2015 at 09:00, Julien Cristau julien.cris...@logilab.fr wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:56:55 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: [Julien Cristau, 2015-07-20] On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 21:28:32 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: Should we patch distutils/setuptools to not generate them?

Re: -nspkg.pth and .pth files - should we get rid of them?

On 20 July 2015 at 13:04, Julien Cristau julien.cris...@logilab.fr wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 07:58:13 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: On Jul 20, 2015, at 01:12 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: Is that a serious question? Why should debian-python, for no good reason, break things that work just

Re: /usr/bin/python in Python 2 and 3

#!/usr/bin/python32 For bilingual scripts. On 17 Apr 2015 2:30 pm, Geoffrey Thomas geo...@ldpreload.com wrote: I've written up the proposal I made a few days ago for a /usr/bin/python launcher that keeps the API of being Python 2, but lets scripts opt in to running on Python 3:

Re: Python 2 d-d-a proposal

I am happy to help porting things. I did it for a number of non trivial packages and happy to do more. It's very soothing experience and better than knitting sudoku. On 15 Apr 2015 2:29 pm, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote: Heyya d-p, I'd like to send an email to d-d-a asking that

Re: multiprocessing.queues.Queue does not work in pbuilder?

Hello, On 29 January 2015 at 09:01, Ole Streicher oleb...@debian.org wrote: Hi, I am trying to get the release candidate for python-astropy packaged. The packaging includes a number of tests, where many fail in pbuilder, which can be traced back to: $ sudo pbuilder login # apt-get install

Re: Age of built packages to be part of the jessie release?

Following on this conversation. I did some simple stats. There are 6361 binary packages that have the same name in stable and testing on (all, amd64) architecture. This translates into 4821 source packages. Skimming through the list of them, I've poked some that for sure will generate a diff if

Re: Fighting commit storm madness (was: [Python-modules-commits] [python-mplexporter] 135/135: Merge pull request #30 from rainwoodman/patch-1)

On 9 October 2014 20:57, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote: On October 9, 2014 10:43:38 AM EDT, Barry Warsaw ba...@debian.org wrote: On Oct 09, 2014, at 10:19 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: Upstream commits are off topic. Agreed. There's no reason why we need notifications of upstream

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

On 6 August 2014 14:18, Barry Warsaw ba...@debian.org wrote: On Aug 06, 2014, at 08:47 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: (That said I'm also rather annoyed by the fact that the team hasn't switched to git yet.) We've had these discussions on this mailing list before, but I think we should discuss it

Re: Setting DPMT as maintainer for python-repoze.what

On 22 May 2014 02:15, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: Hi Dimitri (and the rest of the DPMT), I'm uploading a new version of python-repoze.what with some maintenance work. I've set DPMT as maintainer, and you and I as uploaders. I don't really care about this particular package, but

Bug#746741: release.debian.org: dh-python2 transition

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Dear release team, Debian python teams would find useful to evaluate on continuous basis removal of python-support from the archive and thus migrating to dh-python2. We are uncertain of the scope, and the pace at which this transition can be

Re: Getting rid of python-support?

On 30 April 2014 18:01, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote: Am 30.04.2014 17:31, schrieb Luca Falavigna: Hi, python-central is gone (\o/) and python-support usage is slowly decreasing in the archive: http://lintian.debian.org/tags/dh_pysupport-is-obsolete.html Do you think it would be

Re: Getting rid of python-support?

On 30 April 2014 18:27, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: * Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org, 2014-04-30, 16:43: python-central is gone (\o/) and python-support usage is slowly decreasing in the archive: http://lintian.debian.org/tags/dh_pysupport-is-obsolete.html Do you think it would

Re: Some thoughts about py{support,central} - dh_python2 conversion

On 12 November 2013 15:08, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: * Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2012-05-03, 21:41: 2) Do not skip the Before you begin[0] step. This is very important: if two packages share a namespace, either both or none of them must use python-support. Also, it's not enough

Re: RFS: Pyspread 0.2.6-1

On 19 February 2014 15:45, Barry Warsaw ba...@debian.org wrote: On Feb 18, 2014, at 09:10 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: I don't really know how autopkgtests work, but if they're run automatically during the build process like dh_auto_test, then that would cause your package to FTBFS. Can you modify

Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same

On 25 January 2014 17:21, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote: Huh? Thomas seemed to be doing the right thing per the DPMT standards etc; if you change the python helper, you HAVE TO contact who's maintaining the package and have they ack the change, that's the team standard. No, one does

Re: Using git-svn and gbp for DPMT - Was: Re: Joining the DPMT and git.debian.org access

On 15 January 2014 02:29, Chow Loong Jin hyper...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:51:20PM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote: Now, if you both want to track upstream sources from origin/master on local upstream/ branch and svn's trunk on local master branch, then, yes, a debian/gbp.conf

Re: Fw: [Debian Wiki] Update of Python/LibraryStyleGuide by FedericoCeratto

On 27 December 2013 15:00, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 12/17/2013 01:02 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: [...] You'll want to have at least the following build dependencies: * debhelper (= 8) - * dh-python * python-all (= 2.6.6-3~) * python-setuptools * python3-all

Re: pybuild and not always preventing network connection in auto tests

On 11 December 2013 15:24, Olivier Berger olivier.ber...@telecom-sudparis.eu wrote: Hi. AFAIU, pybuild prevents accesses to the network. But this can be problematic during auto_tests that will perform HTTP connections on a local HTTP server (I have such an example in rdflib's auto tests

Re: pybuild and not always preventing network connection in auto tests

On 11 December 2013 15:33, Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org wrote: On 11 December 2013 15:24, Olivier Berger olivier.ber...@telecom-sudparis.eu wrote: Hi. AFAIU, pybuild prevents accesses to the network. But this can be problematic during auto_tests that will perform HTTP connections

RFS: DPMT: python-hl7 0.2.0

] https://github.com/johnpaulett/python-hl7 [2] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/python-hl7/trunk/ Thank you, John Paulett j...@paulett.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Re: RFS: DPMT: python-hl7 0.2.0

you again! John On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: Hi John, On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:12:46AM -0500, John Paulett wrote: I am the upstream maintainer of python-hl7 [1] and have packaged it for Debian.  I was hoping that a DD may be able to review the package

Re: RFS: DPMT: python-hl7 0.2.0

Jakub, I corrected debian/copyright in subversion (the parsing error on was caused by empty lines inside the license). I also corrected the License short name. As I am packaging novice, please advise if this warrants an new upload. Thank you, John On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Jakub Wilk

Re: RFS: DPMT: python-hl7 0.2.0

Andreas--thanks for reviewing and uploading the package. I changed the distribution to unstable and svn tagged the upload. On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:43:39AM -0500, John Paulett wrote: In regards to the XML file licensing

Request for membership in python-modules team (was Request for review / sponsorship for jsonpickle)

in Debian. Thank you, John Paulett j...@paulett.org On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Jan Dittberner j...@dittberner.info wrote: On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 04:26:49PM -0600, John Paulett wrote: Hello, I uploaded my first Debian package, jsonpickle, to mentors.debian.org (http://mentors.debian.net

Re: Request for review / sponsorship for jsonpickle

=details;package=jsonpickle I would greatly appreciate any comments or suggestions, and eventually sponsorship. Thank you! John Paulett j...@paulett.org On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Jan Dittberner j...@dittberner.info wrote: On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 04:26:49PM -0600, John Paulett wrote

Request for review / sponsorship for jsonpickle

acceptable. I am one of the upstream maintainers of this package. Thank you, John Paulett j...@paulett.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: [Distutils] formencode as .egg in Debian ??

to inform those distributors of any problem you see before they get too far. John

Re: Release Team meeting minutes - 2005-06-18

On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 10:03:05AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: * John Goerzen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050620 05:47]: Not everyone can be in an IRC discussion. There are pesky things like sleep, work, and Real Life that mean that it's not possible for everyone to participate in a real-time

Bug#305461: O: gnupginterface

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I am orphaning this package. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Seeking a good home for OfflineIMAP

: the IMAP communication code. And that is because it has to use imaplib, which doesn't lend itself very well to, erm, clean code :-) If you're interested, I'd encourage you to sign up[2] for the offlineimap list and post there, so we can get started right away. Thanks, John [1] http://quux.org/devel

ANN: Pycaml for Debian

. Python programmers will find it similar to the Jython system for Java. Enjoy. -- John

Python transition

on with life. -- John

Re: python transition summary

in the TODO list should have an associated bug report. The bugs often already exist but the TODO items simply are not annotated. I may be able to assist with the annotation. Regards, -John Belmonte

Re: python 2.2 - python 2.3 transition

*) Actually, all that have that are now uninstallable. Some important ones have that, such as libwxgtk2.4-python. Shouldn't they depend on python2.2 instead? -- John

#!/usr/bin/python2.3 vs #!/usr/bin/env python2.3

prior to the system's, and it doesn't necessarily have requisite libraries for the programs being run. Any opinions? -- John

ANN: Pyme -- Python OO interface to GPGME

Thought some of you may be interested in this -- it's hit ftp-master now, and is just waiting for approval. Comments welcome :-) It's taken a good deal of work, but I like it. - Forwarded message from John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 19

Re: Question for the transition

deleting and reinstalling .py files could possibly make. -- John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]GPG: 0x8A1D9A1Fwww.complete.org

Stackless Python?

Has this been packaged? Are there any plans to do so? -- John

[no subject]

Hey there, I found a great retail site with all kinds of products. Home decor, office decor, travel, outdoors, kitchen, etc... Take a look around at http://www.merchandisewholesale.com just click on the images of the product to enlarge it for a better view. Sincerely, John

Re: Packaging of more zope products

Yes, there is squishdot, which I maintain. More may happen but it's just that new zope packages are appearing faster than people care to package them, I think. Since it's fairly easy to install most Zope packages, anyway. Christian Leutloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, for ZOPE exists

what apt line?

What line should I put in apt-sources to get the packages from www.debian.org/~flight/... thanks -- John Travers Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us!