Re: Requesting upload of proxmoxer 1.1.1-1 to unstable
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 09:01:34 +0200 Elena ``of Valhalla'' Grandi wrote: > thanks for your work Thanks for your guidance. This is very much appreciated. Cheers, Lorenz
Re: Requesting upload of proxmoxer 1.1.1-1 to unstable
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:04:20 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > We are frozen so nothing except targeted serious fixes should be > uploaded to unstable. Right. Sorry, my bad. Cheers, Lorenz
Requesting upload of proxmoxer 1.1.1-1 to unstable
Hi, I updated proxmoxer to upstream 1.1.1 (latest stable release). I've pushed debian/master, upstream and pristine-tar branches now to salsa. I did a smoke test (debian/rules clean, debian/rules build, debian/rules binary) and the result looks like a respectable debian package. The only thing left is "dch -r", release tagging and build, I guess. @Elena would you mind taking a look if everything is okay and then upload to unstable? Cheers, Lorenz
Re: Updating proxmoxer [Was: Re: Request to Join DPT]
Hi Elena, On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:41:41 +0100 Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: > Yes, please, a merge request would help: I've looked into it a few > times already and wasn't able to finish it in the time I had. > > But since it's going into experimental, wouldn't it be better to > package the latest released version (1.1.1), or possibly even 1.2.0b1 > (the very latest version on pypi)? I followed the docs in the wiki[1] and it looks like gbp does its thing across three branches (debian/master, upstream and pristine-tar). Thus I opened three MRs with the result: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/proxmoxer/-/merge_requests/2 https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/proxmoxer/-/merge_requests/3 https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/proxmoxer/-/merge_requests/4 I used tar files downloaded from github for the intermediate releases and `gbp import-orig --pristine-tar --uscan` for the most recent one. I guess that the entries in the changelog could be squashed (unless we'd like to release 1.1.1 separately from 1.2.0b1). 1) https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging#New_upstream_release HTH Lorenz
Re: Updating proxmoxer [Was: Re: Request to Join DPT]
Hi, On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 17:50:43 +0100 Lorenz Schori wrote: > Version 1.0.4 has some small fixes for the ssh backend and some > improvements for the http backend. Nothing major though. If it is > viable to include that in bullseye, then why not. Also note that > upstream changed to proxmoxer/proxmoxer. Would it help if I open merge requests for that (one against pristine-tar, one against upstream and one against debian/master for changelog etc.). Cheers, Lorenz
Re: Updating proxmoxer [Was: Re: Request to Join DPT]
Hi Elena, On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 16:37:54 +0100 Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: > [...] > Have you already checked how significant the difference is? I suspect > that the delta would be too much to be reasonable even under the > current freeze rules (and Prometheus PVE Exporter as a new package > would need to target bookworm anyway): Version 1.0.4 has some small fixes for the ssh backend and some improvements for the http backend. Nothing major though. If it is viable to include that in bullseye, then why not. Also note that upstream changed to proxmoxer/proxmoxer. $ git diff --stat upstream/1.0.3...upstream/1.0.4 | grep py proxmoxer/__init__.py | 2 +- proxmoxer/backends/base_ssh.py | 2 +- proxmoxer/backends/https.py | 5 +- proxmoxer/core.py | 25 ++- setup.py| 2 +- tests/base/base_ssh_suite.py| 8 +- Version 1.1.0/1.1.1 introduces token authentication. There is no reason to rush that into bullseye though. There is still the option to push it to backports if people like that feature. > what would you think about an upload of updated proxmoxer to > experimental? Sure! Any progress is very welcome! Cheers, Lorenz
Request to Join DPT
Hi, I am the author of Prometheus PVE Exporter[1]. I recently discovered that there is only one somewhat exotic dependency left (proxmoxer[2]) which needs some love before Prometheus PVE Exporter itself could be packaged for Debian. I'd like to bring that dependency up-to-date in a first step and then propose to include Prometheus PVE Exporter after that. My salsa username is: znerol I did read and I do accept the Debian Python Team Policy: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/policy.rst Cheers, Lorenz 1) https://github.com/prometheus-pve/prometheus-pve-exporter 2) https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/proxmoxer 3) https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/index.html
