Re: about kicking python-uniconvertor out of the team

Hi, 2015-12-14 19:17 GMT+01:00 Mattia Rizzolo : > Turned out Luca already did the pysupport→dh-python migration back the > time we were on svn, but didn't upload, so I'm just holding off a dput. I actually dput'ed it myself, but the upload was autorejected due to #699301. I'd

Re: python-support removal effort

2015-08-22 14:32 GMT+02:00 Stefano Rivera stefa...@debian.org: Following on from the MBF on packages still using python-support, some of us at DebConf, have held some mini-BSPs to team-upload/NMU affected packages. You can see join the progress here:

Re: Attempting to remove python-support?

Ciao Sandro, 2015-04-27 14:20 GMT+02:00 Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org: which is only in sid only because of sparc and its bd-uninstallable Nice catch! I'll change the query to make sure to include newest sources only. the list doesnt remove duplicates: $ tail -n+3 ~/Downloads/python-support

Re: Attempting to remove python-support?

2015-04-26 18:26 GMT+02:00 Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org: I'd be available to identify the affected packages and eventually filing all the bugs. TTBOMK, dak knows about these packages, see attachment. We should be around 428 packages (hence, bugs). Cheers, Luca python-support

Re: Attempting to remove python-support?

2015-04-27 14:52 GMT+02:00 Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org: Nice catch! I'll change the query to make sure to include newest sources only. I already wrote an UDD query a couple of years ago, which I forgot ;-) https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/python_helpers.cgi That should list all

Attempting to remove python-support?

Hi, now that Jessie has been released, and there's the intention to provide more support for Python 3 (e.g. paultag's mail to d-d-a), would it be time to start kicking out python-support from Debian as well? According to lintian, there should be about 500 packages still using python-support in a

pybuild and unittest at build time

Hi, A package I'd like to sponsor has a test suite [0], and I'd like to be able to run it at build time. Launching python{,3} test_isoweek.py seems enough to trigger the test suite. pybuild is not able to run the test suite automatically, could you suggest me the best way to implement this

Re: RFS: kupfer 0+v208-5

Hi Hugo, 2014-06-07 17:52 GMT+02:00 Hugo Lefeuvre hugo6...@orange.fr: I'm asking for a review and, if it's possible for an upload of kupfer 0+v208-5, available in debian-mentors[0] and in the PAPT repository[1]. I just sponsored it. Thanks for maintaining kupfer! Cheers, Luca -- To

Re: Getting rid of python-support?

2014-04-30 19:27 GMT+02:00 Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org: This tag doesn't catch indirect use of python-support, via dh or cdbs. The actual number of affect packages is much higher. Indeed, I erroneously thought it considered build dependencies as well. I'll propose a new check to take into

Getting rid of python-support?

Hi, python-central is gone (\o/) and python-support usage is slowly decreasing in the archive: http://lintian.debian.org/tags/dh_pysupport-is-obsolete.html Do you think it would be the right time to prepare a mass bug filing asking to convert to dh_python{2,3}? Cheers, Luca -- To

Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same

2014-01-26 Barry Warsaw ba...@debian.org: I do think we should be switching all team maintained packages to dh_py2 and finally getting rid of py-support and py-central (!). python-central is no longer a problem, see #717091 :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Status of python-central and dh_python

2013/7/22 anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com: Does that mean that helper to build Python packages is finally rewritten in Python? Unrelated, but yes: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=dh-python/dh-python.git;a=tree -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Status of python-central and dh_python

Hi! Just to let you know about some good news regarding the deprecated python helpers. python-central has just been removed from unstable, as you can see in [0]. The only package still using python-central is gozerbot-plugins [1], which should be removed from the archive very soon. I'll make

Re: python-support deprecation MBF coordination

2013/5/19 Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org: as discussed in [0], I'd like to propose a mass bug filing to announce the deprecation of python-support. Given the large number of bugs, I followed Julien's advice to provide a lintian tag for python-support: http://bugs.debian.org/709615 http

Status of python2.6 removal

Hi! This is a quick status update about the efforts to get rid of python2.6 from the archive. A good number of reverse dependencies have been processed, and don't have python2.6 dependencies anymore. At the moment, the following packages are still to be transitioned: * crystalspace - Barry

Python plans for Jessie?

Hi! We're all happy for the release of Wheezy, but now it's time to think about Jessie, and to consider the plans for Python ecosystem. Here are some goals/points of discussion I'd like to tackle immediately, to have enough time to squeeze them in time for Jessie. Feel free to add more points :)

Re: pythonX.Y maintenance team

Il 03 aprile 2012 10:36, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org ha scritto: If you volunteered in #573745 already, and you're still available, please reiterate your availability here. I'm willing to help too, but I would limit by doing grunt work such as bug triaging and cleanup. I know this kind

Re: getting rid of python-central

Il 03/03/2012 23:14, Arthur de Jong ha scritto: I've been seeing what it would take to remove python-central from my system and it wasn't actually that much so I sent patches to the BTS for the remaining packages and fixed a few python-apps-team and python-modules-team packages in SVN. You

Future of python2.6 in Debian

Hi, I was pointed at ordereddict package in the NEW queue, which is a backport of OrderedDict object, also available in stock python2.7. After switching python-defaults to python2.7, I'm not sure we discussed whether to keep python2.6 for Wheezy or not. In theory, we should be able to get rid of

Re: python2.7 as default: where are we? (Was: Bug#641207: ITP: ordereddict)

) WITHOUT PATCHES * setools (#625678) * freevo (#629085) * openmeeg (#631856) * subvertpy (#632225) [1] #622279 produces a 500 error, so this is based on data I previously collected in the bug report. -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc

Re: Combining the wiki pages

2011/6/28 Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org: There's a lot of similarity between these two wiki pages, and I often find myself having to edit or open them both.  I think it would make more sense to combine them into one page.    http://wiki.debian.org/Python/PyCentral2DhPython2    

Re: Bug#623820: Status of python2.5 removal

. -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Status of python2.5 removal

. -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: dh_python2 transition

of unmaintained helpers is certainly helpful, but we should care of it only if that reveals to be the biggest issue, or we'll probably end up into Wheezy freeze with lots of packages to be managed, with a limited manpower. -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org

Re: dh_python2 transition

on the python-central - dh_python2 conversions. Bugs have been filed already: http://tinyurl.com/6g4887p -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

python2.5 removal: dd-list of affected packages

-bhtree (U) mgltools-opengltk (U) mgltools-pyglf (U) mgltools-sff (U) Fabio Tranchitella kob...@debian.org bobo (U) zconfig (U) zope.testing (U) Davide Truffa dav...@catoblepa.org obmenu [0] http://bugs.debian.org/623820 [1] http://deb.li/py25 -- .''`. : :' : Luca

Bug#623820: RM: python2.5

-libavg (#580678) [amd64 armel i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc] libopensync-plugin-python: opensync-module-python (#591566) scribus-ng: scribus-ng [hurd-i386] (removing binary from the archive?) == Require removal == python-multiprocessing (#623826) -- .''`. : :' : Luca

Discuss Python plans for (early) wheezy cycle

] http://lists.debian.org/20110118193635.gc4...@halon.org.uk [1] http://wiki.debian.org/Python/27transition -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Packages up for adoption

) and Benjamin (co-maintainer of ubuntu-dev-tools, which depends on all of these packages to work). All of them are packaged in DPMT Subversion repository. * lazr.restfulclient * lazr.uri * python-launchpadlib * python-wadllib Thanks, -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org

Re: Packages up for adoption

in Ubuntu main too). -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Thoughts on the transition to Python 2.7

wiki.debian.org/Python so that everyone can follow along and hopefully participate. Fully agreed. -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Proposed Email to the release team about XS/B-P-V

Il giorno Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:15:46 -0400 Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com ha scritto: I have consulted with Luca Falavigna (DktrKranz) and Jakub Wilk (jwilk), who did most of the analysis for the last two Python transitions (Adding 2.6 to supported versions and the current transition

Re: Policy for Specifying Supported Versions for Python3

to python3 is dangerous. I once read that almost 90% of the code needs at least basic porting. Regards, -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Possible Mass Bug Filing: String Exceptions Removed in Python 2.6

reply to debian-python with fix reports or reports of false positives. Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org boa-constructor python-scipy (U) pythoncad scons Excluding scons (which is already fixed in upstream trunk, will be in Debian too as soon as release is announced, ETA is mid June

Re: Comments regarding pyimport-relative_0.1.0-1_amd64.changes

with 2.4) in concise manner, since our discussion (in private) was too convoluted and now I've forgotten all the arguments. On Wed, 12 May 2010, Luca Falavigna wrote: Hi, AFAIK, relative imports are available from 2.5, is this package really needed? Cheers, Luca Personally, I think it's

Re: Python2.4 has been removed, now what for Zopistas and Plonistas?

for the time being, as they have to be fixed, and clearing NEW again wouldn't have been that efficient. If those packages are beyond any repair, maybe filing RM bugs against them is the way to go. Fabio, thoughts? Regards, -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org

Re: Ongoing Python Transition: related FTBFSes

with that. I just uploaded a new pygtk revision which fixes #548211 too. -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

binNMUs for python2.6

/python2.6_binNMUs Regards, -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Request to join the Python Modules Packaging Team

packages. It's not a requirement, just a different approach which can can lead to quicker and better reviews. -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: new dh_python proposal

/ --install-lib=/usr/share/privatedir3/ --install-scripts=/usr/share/privatedir3 debian/mypackage/usr/lib/privatedir3/egg/__init__.py debian/mypackage/usr/lib/privatedir3/run.py Are files installed under $(CURDIR)/usr/*lib* ? -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org

Re: [MBF] Handling python2.4 removal

Il giorno Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:11:18 +0100 Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org ha scritto: Squeze will release with Python 2.5 and Python 2.6, while Python 2.4 is scheduled for removal when no packages will depend on it. When Python 2.6 will enter unstable, Python 2.4 will be no longer

Advice: how to effectively maintain pyparted in Debian?

/no_Fedora.patch [3]https://fedorahosted.org/pyparted/changeset/cfb1d2271bb55600c7acba2ddd7230a1888ce874 Regards, -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[MBF] Handling python2.4 removal

Packaging Team python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org python-wsgiref (U) Ganesan Rajagopal rgane...@debian.org ctypes Noah Slater nsla...@bytesexual.org python-wsgiref Bernd Zeimetz b...@debian.org elementtree (U) Regards, -- Scott Kitterman Luca Falavigna signature.asc

Re: Python Policy Update

://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy [3] http://tiny.pl/hqwjz Regards, -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices

. It looks fine to me otherwise, thanks again! -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Lintian warnings for Python packaging?

. It is currently unmanaged by python-support, so I think a notice to maintainers about this could be interesting. I don't dare to touch XS-P-V or pyversions at all, given that there are several implications for those files. -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org

Re: Lintian warnings for Python packaging?

errors not easily discoverable at build time. That is worth the severity, IMHO. For the rest, I agree they're not based on policy but on a wiki page, we could wait for the new policy to be drafted, I'm not sure when this will happen, though. -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org

Re: Lintian warnings for Python packaging?

. :) -dbg packages are useful for debugging purposes, so it's not strictly necessary (hence the pedantic). There are plans to provide automatic dbgsym packages, but I don't think they can handle Python ones. I'll have a look at this matter. -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org

Re: Lintian warnings for Python packaging?

) in the first place. I thought this was already defined, but probably not in Lintian. * W: Arch: all package but build-dependency on python*-dev I've already filed a bug about this: http://bugs.debian.org/551793 Thanks. -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org

Fw: RFS: python-coverage 3.0.1-1

It seems my message didn't passed through, so I re-send it, I hope with a better fate. Data: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 11:43:25 +0200 Da: Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org A: Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au Cc: debian-ment...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org Oggetto: Re: RFS

Re: Bug#550458: RFA: petsc4py -- Python bindings for PETSc libraries

and lists possible workarounds, so it's worth investigating with petsc/openmpi maintainers. Regards, -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Quick analysis of the Python dist-packages transition

packages to the channel topic, they will be processed quicker. Regards, -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature

find_python_dependencies.py: recursively search for Python modules

with this new approach. Regards, [1]http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/python-modules/tools/find_python_dependencies.py [2]http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/python-modules/tools/find_python_dependencies.py?r1=6993r2=9691 - -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- -BEGIN PGP

Re: XS-Python-Version vs pyversions

, -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: XS-Python-Version vs pyversions

. -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: transmissionrpc (fixed)

## 01_setup.dpatch by Timur Birsh t...@linukz.org ## DP: Use distutils -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: transmissionrpc (fixed)

regards! -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#542786: O: python-httplib2 -- A comprehensive HTTP client library written in python

python-httplib2 has been de-facto unmaintained in Debian for a long time. I am now orphaning it, so someone (hi debian-pyt...@!) can adopt it. I'll have a look at it, thanks. -- . ''`. Luca Falavigna : :' : Ubuntu MOTU Developer `. `'` Debian Maintainer `- GPG Key

Re: Preparing for the new python-support

. How can we find these bugs; is there a query that reveals them? I think they're tracked here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=j...@debian.org;tag=pysupport-transition Regards, - -- . ''`. Luca Falavigna : :' : Ubuntu MOTU Developer `. `'` Debian Maintainer

RFS: pyparted

-modules/packages/pyparted/trunk/ [2]http://bugs.debian.org/512011 Thank you in advance. - -- . ''`. Luca Falavigna : :' : Ubuntu MOTU Developer `. `'` Debian Maintainer `- GPG Key: 0x86BC2A50 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG

Re: RFS: pyfltk

not :) - -- . ''`. Luca Falavigna : :' : Ubuntu MOTU Developer `. `'` Debian Maintainer `- GPG Key: 0x86BC2A50 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm7i7cACgkQnXjXEYa8KlCSxQCdFYiGo

Re: RFS: pyfltk

, and will proceed to upload the package within the next few days unless somebody else chooses to step in. Thanks! I'll also have a look at the package to adhere to 3.8.1 policy. Regards, - -- . ''`. Luca Falavigna : :' : Ubuntu MOTU Developer `. `'` Debian Maintainer `- GPG Key

RFS: pyfltk

/python-modules/packages/pyfltk/trunk/ [2] http://bugs.debian.org/506646 Thank you in advance :) - -- . ''`. Luca Falavigna : :' : Ubuntu MOTU Developer `. `'` Debian Maintainer `- GPG Key: 0x86BC2A50 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using