On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 05:59:12PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> On 2021-02-12 16:18, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > python3-minimal ≤ python3-core ≤ python3 ≤ python3-full
> +1. Exactly how I would understand these names.
I see your point too. I guess python3-full is the way to go then,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:37:39PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> I saw some discussion about this before, and it does sound nice, but it
> would require change to a few thousand packages to handle such a
> transition, where adding python3-full doesn't really add work for anyone
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:08:14AM +0200, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> I wanted to point out that this follows the pattern set by the many other
> *-full packages in Debian, such as ruby-full.
Perhaps python3-core would be more appropriate, and python3-full can be
left for something even bigger.
Please add my DD account to DPMT group on salsa: vvidic
I am already a member as vvidic-guest and agree to follow
the team policy.
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 07:41:49PM +0100, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> * Package name: parallax
> Version : 1.0.1
> Upstream Author : Kristoffer Gronlund <k...@koru.se>
> * URL : https://github.com/krig/parallax/
> * License : BSD
Owner: Valentin Vidic <valentin.vi...@carnet.hr>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
* Package name: parallax
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Kristoffer Gronlund <k...@koru.se>
* URL : https://github.com/k
I would like to join DPTM. My intention is to package
parallax python module in accordance with DPTM Policy:
This module is required in the recent versions of the
existing python application package crmsh.
My alioth username is vvidic-guest
Mail list logo