skimage (was: Re: Bug#729956: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas)

2017-10-10 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Sat, Sep 16 2017, Yuri D'Elia wrote: > Looking at python3-skimage-lib (which also requires a rebuild), it seems > that the package failed to pass some tests. > > Bug #868582 even includes a patch to update to 0.13 [and disables some > test failures]. Has anyone had a chance to

Re: Bug#729956: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas

2017-09-16 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Sat, Sep 16 2017, Diane Trout wrote: > I was assuming it's because there's a cyclic dependency between pandas > and statsmodels (needed for pandas unit tests), and statsmodels was > also broken by the fpectl problem. > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=875805 > > My solution

Re: Python 3 Statsmodels & Pandas

2017-09-16 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Sat, Sep 16 2017, Diane Trout wrote: > python3-pandas: Pandas is not installable > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=875723 I would have expected the rebuild of python packages affected by the fpectl extension with a transition, but it doesn't seem to be the case?

Re: git-dpm (was Re: Bug#729956: Forwarded upstream)

2017-09-07 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Thu, Sep 07 2017, Brian May wrote: > In general, however, when something does go badly wrong I think it will be a > lot easier to diagnose, understand, and fix with GPB PQ then with git-dpm. > git-dpm can get very messy very quickly, particularly if you forget to pull > before making changes

git-dpm (was Re: Bug#729956: Forwarded upstream)

2017-09-06 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Wed, Sep 06 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: >> But just to confirm, I see that statsmodels is just using >> git-buildpackage? > > Yes. Ok, that's reassuring. I'll have a look at the packaging, since I'm already on alioth. But since DPMT is CC-ed (I normally follow via gmane), I take the occasion

Re: Bug#729956: Forwarded upstream

2017-09-06 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Wed, Sep 06 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: > Great. What about sending a patch with your changes to the bug > report? I've added a branch debian-python3 to I always built from source, not with the debian packaging. >https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/statsmodels.git > >

The state of jupyter in Debian

2016-04-16 Thread Yuri D'Elia
Hi everyone, I have a general question about the state of the jupyter packages. I noticed recently that several packages started to pop-up in the experimental archive, which is great. I've been trying jupyter through anaconda a couple of times, and I'm looking forward to it. Although the actual

Bug#810543: RFS: python-bond/1.4-1 [ITP]

2016-01-09 Thread Yuri D'Elia
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-bond" * Package name: python-bond Version : 1.4-1 Upstream Author : Yuri D'Elia <wav...@thregr.org> * URL : http://www.thregr.org/~wavexx

Re: Joining python-modules

2016-01-04 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On 01/01/16 15:44, Yuri D'Elia wrote: > I've read the policy from > https://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/policy.html and I accept it (in > fact, I love the idea behind collaborative maintenance, collab-maint, > and I subscribed to LowThresholdNmu as well). > > There are thr

Re: Joining python-modules

2016-01-02 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On 01/01/16 15:44, Yuri D'Elia wrote: > I've read the policy from > https://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/policy.html and I accept it (in > fact, I love the idea behind collaborative maintenance, collab-maint, > and I subscribed to LowThresholdNmu as well). I perhaps should

Joining python-modules

2016-01-01 Thread Yuri D'Elia
Hi everyone, I recently wanted to increase my debian contributions as a prospective maintainer. I've read the policy from https://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/policy.html and I accept it (in fact, I love the idea behind collaborative maintenance, collab-maint, and I subscribed to