On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 at 10:23:23 +0100, Agathe Porte wrote:
> 2024-03-15 10:16 CET, Simon McVittie:
> > When the GNOME team switched from debian/master to debian/latest, it
> > was a coordinated change applied to every package maintained by the team.
>
> Do we know if this was automated by a
Hi,
2024-03-15 10:16 CET, Simon McVittie:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 at 08:10:55 +, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
> > To my knowledge in context of DPT and Salsa the branch name "debian/master"
> > is used. When creating a new package are there any technical reasons not
> > renaming that to
Dear Simon,
thanks for drawing that big picture for me.
That info goes to my Zettelkasten.
Kind
Christian Buhtz
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 at 08:10:55 +, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
> To my knowledge in context of DPT and Salsa the branch name "debian/master"
> is used. When creating a new package are there any technical reasons not
> renaming that to "debian/main"?
Naming is a social thing, not a technical
Hello,
my question is technically only. I don't want to troll or start a
discussion. So please just say yes or no. ;)
To my knowledge in context of DPT and Salsa the branch name
"debian/master" is used. When creating a new package are there any
technical reasons not renaming that to
5 matches
Mail list logo
