Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Python 3.7 or 3.6 in Buster
On 05.11.18 20:31, Jerome Kieffer wrote: > On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:26:41 -0500 > Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> I only found out about it due to an upstream bug report on OS X. No one in >> Debian (or Ubuntu) reported it. > > I got one also in fabio: > https://github.com/silx-kit/fabio/pull/243 > Actually there has been a depreciation warning for ages (back to > python 3.4) but this has been silenced since then. > There may be many such bugs around in many packages! I'm seeing a handful more, in failing autopkg tests which run without the allow-stderr restriction. But not a lot of people care yet about succeeding autopkg tests ... Filing bug reports about those.
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Python 3.7 or 3.6 in Buster
On Monday, November 05, 2018 08:31:56 PM Jerome Kieffer wrote: > On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:26:41 -0500 > > Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I only found out about it due to an upstream bug report on OS X. No one > > in > > Debian (or Ubuntu) reported it. > > I got one also in fabio: > https://github.com/silx-kit/fabio/pull/243 > Actually there has been a depreciation warning for ages (back to > python 3.4) but this has been silenced since then. > There may be many such bugs around in many packages! Thanks. Related, but not the same. There was no deprecation warning for re.sub like there was for re.split. In any case, it reinforces my concern. Scott K
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Python 3.7 or 3.6 in Buster
On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:26:41 -0500 Scott Kitterman wrote: > I only found out about it due to an upstream bug report on OS X. No one in > Debian (or Ubuntu) reported it. I got one also in fabio: https://github.com/silx-kit/fabio/pull/243 Actually there has been a depreciation warning for ages (back to python 3.4) but this has been silenced since then. There may be many such bugs around in many packages! Cheers, Jerome
