Re: Next python-mote pre-condition - issue with pybuild: python-backports.tempfile conflicting python-backports.weakref

2018-01-26 Thread Sandro Tosi
> after thinking about this, I think the "easy" solution would be to: > > * create a *backports* package, that simply embeds a backports/__init__.py > > * depends on this backports package itself and simply remove > backports/__init__.py from backports.XXX packages. > > If they depend on

Re: Next python-mote pre-condition - issue with pybuild: python-backports.tempfile conflicting python-backports.weakref

2018-01-26 Thread Olivier Sallou
t; > > À: debian-python@lists.debian.org, "Debian Science List" > > <debian-scie...@lists.debian.org>, 777...@bugs.debian.org > > Envoyé: Lundi 22 Janvier 2018 15:04:10 > > Objet: Re: Next python-mote pre-condition - issue with pybuild: > > py

Re: Next python-mote pre-condition - issue with pybuild: python-backports.tempfile conflicting python-backports.weakref

2018-01-26 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
> > > However, in Debian case, I do not know how this can be handled as > > > 2 packages cannot hold the same file (even if __init__ is only an empty > > > file), and at least one must be present (if you install only one). > > The Python jargon is that the "backports" shared by backports.tempfile

Re: Next python-mote pre-condition - issue with pybuild: python-backports.tempfile conflicting python-backports.weakref

2018-01-25 Thread Simon McVittie
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 at 17:45:33 +, peter green wrote: > > However, in Debian case, I do not know how this can be handled as > > 2 packages cannot hold the same file (even if __init__ is only an empty > > file), and at least one must be present (if you install only one). The Python jargon is

Re: Next python-mote pre-condition - issue with pybuild: python-backports.tempfile conflicting python-backports.weakref

2018-01-25 Thread peter green
> However, in Debian case, I do not know how this can be handled as 2 packages cannot hold the same file (even if __init__ is only an empty file), and at least one must be present (if you install only one). I'm not a python expert but I expect the least-horrible way to do this would be to

Re: Next python-mote pre-condition - issue with pybuild: python-backports.tempfile conflicting python-backports.weakref

2018-01-23 Thread Olivier Sallou
- Mail original - > De: "Andreas Tille" <andr...@an3as.eu> > À: debian-python@lists.debian.org, "Debian Science List" > <debian-scie...@lists.debian.org>, 777...@bugs.debian.org > Envoyé: Lundi 22 Janvier 2018 15:04:10 > Objet: Re: Next

Re: Next python-mote pre-condition - issue with pybuild: python-backports.tempfile conflicting python-backports.weakref

2018-01-22 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Andreas Tille, 2018-01-22] > Hi, > > I kept on working packaging python-moto predependencies. I'm now > stumbling upon python-backports.tempfile[1] and > python-backports.weakref[2]. My naive packaging attempt puts > the modules into > >/usr/lib/python*/dist-packages/backports > >

Re: Next python-mote pre-condition - issue with pybuild: python-backports.tempfile conflicting python-backports.weakref

2018-01-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I kept on working packaging python-moto predependencies. I'm now stumbling upon python-backports.tempfile[1] and python-backports.weakref[2]. My naive packaging attempt puts the modules into /usr/lib/python*/dist-packages/backports leaving the same package