Re: Request to join PAPT (Was: Bug#914230: ITP: git-imerge -- incremental merge and rebase for git)
Hi, čt 22. 11. 2018 v 1:36 odesílatel James Clarke napsal: > It turns out policy.rst is lying, I don't have permission to create a > repository. Therefore I would like to request to join PAPT, please (and > accept the policy even in spite of its lies). > welcome :) -- Best regards Ondřej Nový Email: n...@ondrej.org PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5 6090 3573 1255 9D1E 064B
Re: Request to join PAPT (Was: Bug#914230: ITP: git-imerge -- incremental merge and rebase for git)
Dear Ondrej, > I don't see any merge requests for PAPT. Mea culpa; I misread this as DPMT as you have inferred. > I think it's better to do smaller changes/merge request. mwei, can you > split it to more smaller merge requests please? I would obviously heartily endorse this philosophy but I wonder that for expediency and to correct the now long-incorrect information I suggest we adjust our tolerance here. However, Mwei please do indeed split these into smaller MRs or commits. Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
Re: Request to join PAPT (Was: Bug#914230: ITP: git-imerge -- incremental merge and rebase for git)
Hi, čt 22. 11. 2018 v 10:47 odesílatel Chris Lamb napsal: > > It turns out policy.rst is lying, I don't have permission to create a > > repository. Therefore I would like to request to join PAPT, please (and > > accept the policy even in spite of its lies). > > Python team, can we merge the pending Policy changes? It's getting > a little frustrating reading these (or similar; not sure if this > particular case is addressed…) > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-apps/merge_requests I don't see any merge requests for PAPT. For DPMT I see only one (really huge) merge request: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/merge_requests/2 I think it's better to do smaller changes/merge request. mwei, can you split it to more smaller merge requests please? -- Best regards Ondřej Nový Email: n...@ondrej.org PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5 6090 3573 1255 9D1E 064B
Re: Request to join PAPT (Was: Bug#914230: ITP: git-imerge -- incremental merge and rebase for git)
On 22 Nov 2018, at 08:48, Chris Lamb wrote: > > James Clarke wrote: > >> It turns out policy.rst is lying, I don't have permission to create a >> repository. Therefore I would like to request to join PAPT, please (and >> accept the policy even in spite of its lies). > > Python team, can we merge the pending Policy changes? It's getting > a little frustrating reading these (or similar; not sure if this > particular case is addressed…) Ah, it has been addressed in tools/python-modules's policy.rst, but the PAPT policy was forked from this in tools/python-apps and is missing the subsequent changes. I'll see about consolidating the changes later if nobody beats me to it. Regards, James
Re: Request to join PAPT (Was: Bug#914230: ITP: git-imerge -- incremental merge and rebase for git)
James Clarke wrote: > It turns out policy.rst is lying, I don't have permission to create a > repository. Therefore I would like to request to join PAPT, please (and > accept the policy even in spite of its lies). Python team, can we merge the pending Policy changes? It's getting a little frustrating reading these (or similar; not sure if this particular case is addressed…) Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
Request to join PAPT (Was: Bug#914230: ITP: git-imerge -- incremental merge and rebase for git)
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 07:37:49PM +, James Clarke wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: James Clarke > > * Package name: git-imerge > Version : 1.1.0 > Upstream Author : Michael Haggerty > * URL : https://github.com/mhagger/git-imerge > * License : GPLv2+ > Programming Lang: Python > Description : incremental merge and rebase for git > > Performs a merge between two branches incrementally. If conflicts are > encountered, figures out exactly which pairs of commits conflict, and > presents the user with one pairwise conflict at a time for resolution. > > I recently discovered this useful tool and now use it for my day-to-day > work dealing with forks of large upstream projects. I intend to maintain > this as part of PAPT (which I've just found out is open to all DDs, > though out of courtesy I've still Cc'ed debian-python). Hi, It turns out policy.rst is lying, I don't have permission to create a repository. Therefore I would like to request to join PAPT, please (and accept the policy even in spite of its lies). Thanks, James
