On Fri, 17 Sep 2021, Scott Talbert wrote:
Looking in the salsa repo [0], it is very old. And that shouldn't
happen. I
can updated to the last unstable version tonight/tomorrow.
Just to improve my knowledge about Debian processes: What does it mean
to update the salsa repo to the current
On Thu, 16 Sep 2021, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
Am 15.09.2021 21:36 schrieb Emmanuel Arias:
Looking in the salsa repo [0], it is very old. And that shouldn't
happen. I
can updated to the last unstable version tonight/tomorrow.
Just to improve my knowledge about Debian processes: What does it
Hi Christian,
c.bu...@posteo.jp writes:
> Dear Emmanuel,
>
> Am 15.09.2021 21:36 schrieb Emmanuel Arias:
>> Looking in the salsa repo [0], it is very old. And that shouldn't
>> happen. I
>> can updated to the last unstable version tonight/tomorrow.
>
> Just to improve my knowledge about Debian
Dear Emmanuel,
Am 15.09.2021 21:36 schrieb Emmanuel Arias:
Looking in the salsa repo [0], it is very old. And that shouldn't
happen. I
can updated to the last unstable version tonight/tomorrow.
Just to improve my knowledge about Debian processes: What does it mean
to update the salsa repo
Hello everybody,
> This sounds like a task that should be taken by someone more
> experienced then me.
Looking in the salsa repo [0], it is very old. And that shouldn't happen. I
can updated
to the last unstable version tonight/tomorrow. If There's no objections.
Or, perhaps
Christian (the
Dear Scott
On 2021-09-15 10:59 Scott Talbert wrote:
> so that would need to be sorted out.
This sounds like a task that should be taken by someone more
experienced then me.
On Wed, 15 Sep 2021, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
It seems that this package should probably be fully moved and adopted
into the Debian Python Team - it seems to have been partially done.
I would say the salsa project is outdated because the version number
in setup.py does not fit to upstream.
Thanks for the reply's.
On 2021-09-15 09:02 Scott Talbert wrote:
> It seems that this package should probably be fully moved and adopted
> into the Debian Python Team - it seems to have been partially done.
I would say the salsa project is outdated because the version number
in setup.py does
On Wed, 15 Sep 2021, Andrius Merkys wrote:
https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/x/xlsxwriter/control-1.1.2-0.2
The package does not seem to have a current version control repository.
That would be a good start. There doesn't seem to be a project in
salsa.debian.org and it would make
On 2021-09-15 15:46, Neil Williams wrote:
> https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/x/xlsxwriter/control-1.1.2-0.2
>
> The package does not seem to have a current version control repository.
>
> That would be a good start. There doesn't seem to be a project in
> salsa.debian.org and it would
On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:58:24 +
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is about the "xlsxwriter" package [1] and this one year old bug
> report about defect "homepage" url [2].
>
> I am new in the neighborhood and think this is a good issue to learn
> something about the Debian internals.
>
> So where
Hello,
this is about the "xlsxwriter" package [1] and this one year old bug
report about defect "homepage" url [2].
I am new in the neighborhood and think this is a good issue to learn
something about the Debian internals.
So where does the "homepage" url in the "link" box on the right side of
12 matches
Mail list logo
