Re: .egg in Debian summary?

2006-03-31 Thread Brian Sutherland
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 01:26:41AM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > It even uses python-support =D The code is on pkg-turbogears svn repo at > alioth, and I'll upload it soonish, I hope. > > Comments? Being a Zope-ish hacker myself, I'm very glad to have helped the competition;) -- Brian S

Re: .egg in Debian summary?

2006-03-30 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > Em Ter, 2006-03-28 às 12:49 +0200, Brian Sutherland escreveu: > > I really have no idea how this ought to be done, but here's my way of > > doing it;) If it fries your hard disk, don't blame me. Also if anyone > > has any additions/corrections, le

Re: .egg in Debian summary?

2006-03-30 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Em Ter, 2006-03-28 às 12:49 +0200, Brian Sutherland escreveu: > I really have no idea how this ought to be done, but here's my way of > doing it;) If it fries your hard disk, don't blame me. Also if anyone > has any additions/corrections, let me know. I like your way! > For example upstream conve

Re: .egg in Debian summary?

2006-03-28 Thread Brian Sutherland
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 10:24:39PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Brian Sutherland wrote: > [...] > > For what it's worth, I will be converting most of my packages that build > > with setuptools to use option 3. > > > > That is, of course, until there is some kind of consenus

Re: Hypothetical pkg-python alioth project (was:Re: .egg in Debian summary?)

2006-03-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 01:16 +0200, Carlos Galisteo wrote: > IMHO that would be a great way to mantain python modules, and also a > good "place" for more inexperienced people (like me) to be useful by > doing delegated stuff and learning from the inside. > > Wait...It seems there already exists

Hypothetical pkg-python alioth project (was:Re: .egg in Debian summary?)

2006-03-27 Thread Carlos Galisteo
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 22:24:39 +0200, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, wouldn't it be time to create a pkg-python alioth project much like > the pkg-perl one to globally co-maintain all the python modules ? IMHO that would be a great way to mantain python modules, and also a good

Re: .egg in Debian summary?

2006-03-27 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Brian Sutherland wrote: > > > > [...] > > My opinion is that we probably shouldn't distribute eggs but we must make > > it possible for our users to use them. So I think that the egg meta-info > > ought to be d

Re: .egg in Debian summary?

2006-03-27 Thread Brian Sutherland
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 04:09:52PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > 3. Using Phillip's .egg-info solution > > > > > Well, since there's no progress, it's up to you as package maintainer to > take the decision. The day when we h

Re: .egg in Debian summary?

2006-03-25 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Thu, 09 Feb 2006, Bob Tanner wrote: > > 1. Do nothing, go with the status quo as documented in the Debian python > > policy, which is no .egg's and unpackage everything into a sub-directory of > > site-packages. > > > > 2. Investigate easydeb >

Re: .egg in Debian summary?

2006-02-09 Thread Bob Tanner
Bob Tanner real-time.com> writes: > >> I don't think Debian should use the egg structure. > Read and re-read the complete thread regarding .eggs in Debian and I cannot > tell if any progress has been made. > As "just a package maintainer" I was looking for the "options" to move > forward. > 1

Re: [Distutils] .egg in Debian summary?

2005-11-23 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 12:17 AM 11/23/2005 -0600, Bob Tanner wrote: Bob Tanner wrote: >> I don't think Debian should use the egg structure. It apparently relies >> on building a long sys.path (even though through only a single .pth >> file); > > I'm not sure of how .eggs are implemented, but I'm going to cross-post

Re: [Distutils] .egg in Debian summary?

2005-11-23 Thread Vincenzo Di Massa
Alle 07:17, mercoledì 23 novembre 2005, Bob Tanner ha scritto: > 1. Do nothing, go with the status quo as documented in the Debian python > policy, which is no .egg's and unpackage everything into a sub-directory of > site-packages. > > 2. Investigate easydeb

.egg in Debian summary?

2005-11-22 Thread Bob Tanner
Bob Tanner wrote: >> I don't think Debian should use the egg structure. It apparently relies >> on building a long sys.path (even though through only a single .pth >> file); > > I'm not sure of how .eggs are implemented, but I'm going to cross-post > this info to the python-distutils mailing list