Hi, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
[ Please don't delete attributions ]
Matthias Klose:
some people wanted to be able to keep the default python version at
version 2.2, but install packages from unstable, when the default
versions were different in testing and unstable.
I do doubt such special
On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 03:13, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le ven 21/11/2003 à 01:49, Donovan Baarda a écrit :
Unfortunately, the policy fails to take into account all the
source-package and build-depends issues. This means the clean separation
of python and pythonX.Y is not actually that
Le ven 21/11/2003 à 01:49, Donovan Baarda a écrit :
Unfortunately, the policy fails to take into account all the
source-package and build-depends issues. This means the clean separation
of python and pythonX.Y is not actually that clean... some more work is
needed on the policy to resolve
Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The configure script is checking for 'python' script.
What was the original reason for the 'recommends' instead of
'depends'? It's not really clear to me.
some people wanted to be able to keep the default python version at
version 2.2, but
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 09:16, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
The configure script is checking for 'python' script.
What was the original reason for the 'recommends' instead of
'depends'? It's not really clear to me.
some people wanted to be able to keep the default python version at
Junichi Uekawa writes:
well, I think this is bug in these packages. OTOH, if there are too
many of these, it might be better to change it back. I did never see
much sense in keeping pythonX.Y without keeping python.
The configure script is checking for 'python' script.
What was the
The configure script is checking for 'python' script.
What was the original reason for the 'recommends' instead of
'depends'? It's not really clear to me.
some people wanted to be able to keep the default python version at
version 2.2, but install packages from unstable, when the
Junichi Uekawa writes:
Package: python2.3
Version: 2.3.2-3
python2.3 (2.3.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Downgrade the dependency of python2.3 on python (= 2.3) to
a recommendation.
this seems to have caused buildds to fail because 'python' does not
exist when building packages
8 matches
Mail list logo
