Re: Bug#370833: New dh_python proposal

2006-06-13 Thread Matthias Klose
Joey Hess writes: > I don't particularly mind that you've chosen to NMU debhelper. However, > I can't guarantee that I will preserve the interfaces that you've added > to dh_python in a backwards compatible way when I get around to looking > at it. > > (FWIW, I began ignoring this issue when the p

Re: Bug#370833: New dh_python proposal

2006-06-13 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 13 juin 2006 à 15:23 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit : > (FWIW, I began ignoring this issue when the politics and constant > advocacy and pressure became too annoying to bother with, and I expect > to ignore it for at least another couple of weeks. Unfortunatly that > means that to avoid either t

Re: Bug#370833: New dh_python proposal

2006-06-13 Thread Joey Hess
I don't particularly mind that you've chosen to NMU debhelper. However, I can't guarantee that I will preserve the interfaces that you've added to dh_python in a backwards compatible way when I get around to looking at it. (FWIW, I began ignoring this issue when the politics and constant advocacy

Re: Bug#370833: New dh_python proposal

2006-06-12 Thread Duck
Coin, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Without any answer from you, I might upload it right before dinstall > (depending on the opinion of other involved people). This is perfectly reasonnable. -- Marc Dequènes (Duck) pgpU3t0AM8OF7.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#370833: New dh_python proposal

2006-06-12 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > I would love to have this fixed by today's dinstall. That's why I > > prepared the attached NMU, please just send an OK and I'll upload it (of > > course, feel free to do it yourself in a maintainer upload

Re: Bug#370833: New dh_python proposal

2006-06-12 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I would love to have this fixed by today's dinstall. That's why I > prepared the attached NMU, please just send an OK and I'll upload it (of > course, feel free to do it yourself in a maintainer upload). > > Without any answer from you, I might upload

Re: Bug#370833: New dh_python proposal

2006-06-11 Thread Jonas Meurer
On 10/06/2006 Joe Wreschnig wrote: > > Please reconsider. If you don't integrate that version now, we'll most > > probably do the switch to python2.4 in the next days and we'll replace > > dh_python calls by dh_python2 calls (integrated for example in the python > > package) or we'll remove call to

Re: Bug#370833: New dh_python proposal

2006-06-11 Thread Andreas Barth
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060611 10:13]: > * Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060611 10:00]: > > What is slowing our progress is the refusal to let the time decide between > > python-central and/or python-support. There's no consensus here and if you > > need to make a choice, your o

Re: Bug#370833: New dh_python proposal

2006-06-11 Thread Andreas Barth
* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060611 10:00]: > What is slowing our progress is the refusal to let the time decide between > python-central and/or python-support. There's no consensus here and if you > need to make a choice, your only possibility is to request the technical > committee to m

Re: Bug#370833: New dh_python proposal

2006-06-11 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Dafydd Harries wrote: > Ar 10/06/2006 am 21:50, ysgrifennodd Raphael Hertzog: > > I have written dh_pycentral and dh_pysupport which will take care of the > > byte-compilation of the modules and integration with the respective tools. > > Those should be integrated in their resp

Re: Bug#370833: New dh_python proposal

2006-06-10 Thread Dafydd Harries
Ar 10/06/2006 am 21:50, ysgrifennodd Raphael Hertzog: > I have written dh_pycentral and dh_pysupport which will take care of the > byte-compilation of the modules and integration with the respective tools. > Those should be integrated in their respective packages (after review by > their maintainer

Re: Bug#370833: New dh_python proposal

2006-06-10 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > I appreciate your work, but I am not comfortable supporting two > > competing implementations in debhelper. > > Please reconsider. If you don't integrate that version now, we'll most > probably do the switch to python2.4 in the next days and we'll re

Re: Bug#370833: New dh_python proposal

2006-06-10 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 09:08 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Fri, 09 Jun 2006, Joey Hess wrote: > > Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > Because Matthias and Josselin do not (or can't or don't want to) work > > > together. I tried my best to fill the gap. :-/ > > > > I appreciate your work, but I am not

Re: Bug#370833: New dh_python proposal

2006-06-10 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 09 Jun 2006, Joey Hess wrote: > Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Because Matthias and Josselin do not (or can't or don't want to) work > > together. I tried my best to fill the gap. :-/ > > I appreciate your work, but I am not comfortable supporting two > competing implementations in debhelper.

Re: Bug#370833: New dh_python proposal

2006-06-09 Thread Joey Hess
Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Because Matthias and Josselin do not (or can't or don't want to) work > together. I tried my best to fill the gap. :-/ I appreciate your work, but I am not comfortable supporting two competing implementations in debhelper. Sorry. -- see shy jo signature.asc Descriptio