let's continue this on d-{devel,python} On Dec 22, 2007 8:50 PM, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Julien Cristau [Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:41:37 +0100]: > > > Why not use the same name for both? I think it'd be clearer, and > > has no drawbacks afaics. > > +1. I personally dislike so many python modules "suffering" from this.
and > > Why not use the same name for both? I think it'd be clearer, and > > has no drawbacks afaics. > > On Debian Python Modules Team requested me not to change source > package name from upstream name if not strictly necessary. I'd call > them both the same (it's clearer for me too) if was not for that > advice. I'd like to have source and binary package name the same (thuogh I understand it's not needed to have source package renamed from upstream one), but that would be linear (for me). Thanks, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/