Re: Bug#579379: Comments regarding pyimport-relative_0.1.0-1_amd64.changes

2010-05-27 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
With the permission of Rocky, I am forwarding his reply here verbatim: I am in Crackow right now and my Internet setup is not quite ideal. Below is why pyimport relative is used. I will reply in full when I get back in about a week. But here are the salient points Python's import re

Re: Comments regarding pyimport-relative_0.1.0-1_amd64.changes

2010-05-27 Thread Sandro Tosi
mh, probably I'm missing something: - is pyimport-relative only available for 2.4? - is pyimport-relative an incompatible implementation of relative imports as present in python >=2.5 ? - would it be possible to "port" to relative import as in python >= 2.5 and declare pydbgr as only available for

Re: Comments regarding pyimport-relative_0.1.0-1_amd64.changes

2010-05-27 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Luca Falavigna, 2010-05-27] > Personally, I think it's better asking pydbgr upstream to see if there's > chance to adjust code to use relative imports provided by python2.5, > unless implementation is way too different to be impossible to do otherwise. ... or not use relative imports at all -- P

Re: Comments regarding pyimport-relative_0.1.0-1_amd64.changes

2010-05-27 Thread Luca Falavigna
This is relative to pyimport-relative package, currently in NEW. These are considerations taken with Debian maintainer, and before going any further, I'd like to share some thoughts with Debian Python maintainers. Il 12/05/2010 21.24, Yaroslav Halchenko ha scritto: > Hi Luca, > > This package is