Re: Debhelper 7, Python package, multiple binary packages

2010-02-02 Thread Ben Finney
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes: […] while the ‘python-coverage’ binary package is now building correctly, the ‘python-coverage-dbg’ binary package contains nothing useful; it's as though there is no content for that package detected by the tools. Isn't that exactly why I'm using

Re: Debhelper 7, Python package, multiple binary packages

2009-12-26 Thread Ben Finney
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes: Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes: Once I learn how to make a ‘foo-dbg’ package, I can do that in the next release […] I've learned some about creating a ‘foo-dbg’ package [0]. However, I'm ending up with a source package that

Re: Debhelper 7, Python package, multiple binary packages

2009-10-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 18 octobre 2009 à 10:31 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit : = override_dh_pysupport: dh_pysupport /usr/share/backintime/ = Is this necessary? Why can't ‘dh_pysupport’ do this without being overridden here? Yes, dh_pysupport only looks at /usr/share/$package and

Re: Debhelper 7, Python package, multiple binary packages

2009-10-18 Thread Ben Finney
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes: Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes: Once I learn how to make a ‘foo-dbg’ package, I can do that in the next release […] I've learned some about creating a ‘foo-dbg’ package [0]. However, I'm ending up with a source package that

Re: Debhelper 7, Python package, multiple binary packages

2009-10-18 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:31:02AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: Thanks, ‘backintime’ does indeed meet these criteria. The ‘debian/rules’ file is doing some things that I'm confused about: = override_dh_auto_clean: rm -rf locale common/po/*.mo find $(CURDIR) -name

Debhelper 7, Python package, multiple binary packages (was: RFS: python-coverage 3.0.1-1)

2009-10-17 Thread Ben Finney
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes: Once I learn how to make a ‘foo-dbg’ package, I can do that in the next release […] I've learned some about creating a ‘foo-dbg’ package [0]. However, I'm ending up with a source package that installs none of the Python files into any of the binary

Re: Debhelper 7, Python package, multiple binary packages (was: RFS: python-coverage 3.0.1-1)

2009-10-17 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 11:40:07PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: Can someone point me to an existing package that: * uses ‘debhelper’ vversion 7 or later (i.e. uses the implied-sequence ‘dh’ command instead of explicit lists of ‘dh_foo’ commands) * uses ‘python-support’ * creates

Re: Debhelper 7, Python package, multiple binary packages

2009-10-17 Thread Ben Finney
Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk writes: On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 11:40:07PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: * uses ‘debhelper’ vversion 7 or later […] * uses ‘python-support’ * creates multiple packages, preferably including a ‘foo-dbg’ package IIRC, backintime does all but the -dbg