Hi,
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:33:22PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>
> With the attached patch I got the package almost building. Almost,
> becasue the tests fail:
Just to let you know: The package requires a new versioned
Build-Depends pyqi (>= 0.3.2) which I just uploaded.
Thanks for your help
Hi Jakub,
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:38:36PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> I strongly recommend rebuilding everything from source.
With my latest commit I'm recreating the *.c files using cython.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-req
* Andreas Tille , 2014-05-21, 15:05:
I'm now also excluding *.so and *.pyx.
Hmm, *.pyx? Aren't they source code from some *.c files?
Uh, yes, they are - re-added. Thanks for correcting me.
This opens the question about the policy of *.c files: Should these
regenerated at build time (an
* Andreas Tille , 2014-05-21, 15:09:
So, is there a sane way to make pybuild run an arbitrary command with
default version of python, and with PYTHONPATH set to the build
directory?
One insane way is to abuse the --test option:
pyrun = DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS= pybuild -s custom -p $(shell pyversion
[Andreas Tille, 2014-05-21]
> > One insane way is to abuse the --test option:
> >
> > pyrun = DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS= pybuild -s custom -p $(shell pyversions -dv)
> > --test --test-args
> > [...]
> > $(pyrun) 'make --directory=doc singlehtml' # eww!
>
> Well, if there is no other suggestion for
Hi,
sorry for the confusion.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 01:02:23PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Piotr Ożarowski , 2014-05-21, 11:14:
> >>
> >> svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/python-biom-format/trunk/
> >>
> >>Unfortunately the new version has a problem when it comes to
> >>buil
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:12:37PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Andreas Tille , 2014-05-21, 09:52:
> >>> svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/python-biom-format/trunk/
> >>
> >>(Unrelated to your question:) Since you are already repacking
> >>.orig.tar, please get rid of these files:
* Piotr Ożarowski , 2014-05-21, 11:14:
svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/python-biom-format/trunk/
Unfortunately the new version has a problem when it comes to build the
documentation. Either does not find the biom Python module or since I
adapted the packaging to dh_python
* Andreas Tille , 2014-05-21, 09:52:
svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/python-biom-format/trunk/
(Unrelated to your question:) Since you are already repacking
.orig.tar, please get rid of these files:
biom-format-2.0.0/biom/_filter.so
biom-format-2.0.0/biom/_subsample.so
bi
[Andreas Tille, 2014-05-20]
> I intend to update python-biom-format which is maintained at
>
>
> svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/python-biom-format/trunk/
>
> Unfortunately the new version has a problem when it comes to build the
> documentation. Either does not find the b
Hi Jakub,
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:24:11PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >
> > svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/python-biom-format/trunk/
>
> (Unrelated to your question:) Since you are already repacking
> .orig.tar, please get rid of these files:
>
> biom-format-2.0.0/biom/_f
Hi Andreas!
* Andreas Tille , 2014-05-20, 22:34:
svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/python-biom-format/trunk/
(Unrelated to your question:) Since you are already repacking .orig.tar,
please get rid of these files:
biom-format-2.0.0/biom/_filter.so
biom-format-2.0.0/biom/_s
Hi,
I intend to update python-biom-format which is maintained at
svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/python-biom-format/trunk/
Unfortunately the new version has a problem when it comes to build the
documentation. Either does not find the biom Python module or since
I adapted t
13 matches
Mail list logo
