Re: Investigating the reverse dependencies of python-monotonic.

2019-08-15 Thread Simon Josefsson
Thank you! I just uploaded oz with python 3 dependencies. If any python Debian packager want to take a look and suggest improvements that would be great, as I’m mostly guessing how to package python apps in Debian. /Simon > 14 aug. 2019 kl. 09:20 skrev Thomas Goirand : > >> On 8/13/19 9:58

Re: Investigating the reverse dependencies of python-monotonic.

2019-08-14 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 8/13/19 9:58 PM, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Once python3-m2crypto is in Debian, I will port oz to python3. > > /Simon Well, it's in unstable already... Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Re: Investigating the reverse dependencies of python-monotonic.

2019-08-13 Thread Simon Josefsson
Once python3-m2crypto is in Debian, I will port oz to python3. /Simon > 13 aug. 2019 kl. 21:46 skrev Thomas Goirand : > >> On 8/13/19 12:38 PM, peter green wrote: >> Hi >> >> I've been looking at various python 2 cruft packages (packages no longer >> built by the corresponding source packages)

Re: Investigating the reverse dependencies of python-monotonic.

2019-08-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 8/13/19 3:30 PM, peter green wrote: > IMO python-monotonic should be reinstated until it's reverse > dependencies are sorted out. There's now only oz, googleapi and duplicity. The last 2 both have Py3 support upstream in a newer version. Let's fix these, as I fixed all the rest already. If

Re: Investigating the reverse dependencies of python-monotonic.

2019-08-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 8/13/19 12:38 PM, peter green wrote: > python-fasteners (has rdeps) > python-oauth2client (via python-fasteners) FYI, I removed Python 2 support from these 2 today! :) Hopefully, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) will do the work for googleapi, and then we'll get another chain of Py2 removed. :)

Re: Investigating the reverse dependencies of python-monotonic.

2019-08-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 8/13/19 12:38 PM, peter green wrote: > Hi > > I've been looking at various python 2 cruft packages (packages no longer > built by the corresponding source packages) and why they can't be > cleaned up, I have been looking in a derivative but many of my results > are also relevant to debian

Re: Investigating the reverse dependencies of python-monotonic.

2019-08-13 Thread Matthias Klose
On 13.08.19 15:30, peter green wrote: > IMO python-monotonic should be reinstated until it's reverse dependencies are > sorted out. I agree with that.

Re: Investigating the reverse dependencies of python-monotonic.

2019-08-13 Thread peter green
(note for people reading on bug 934333, the start of this thread can be found at https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/08/msg00070.html ) On 13/08/2019 11:54, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: This is worrying, a package with revdeps shouldn't have been dropped. AIUI a "go cleanly" approach

Re: Investigating the reverse dependencies of python-monotonic.

2019-08-13 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:38:33AM +0100, peter green wrote: > One package that stood out from the rest was python-monotonic. > python-monotonic is maintained by the Debian openstack team, but it doesn't > seem to be in any way openstack specific, nor does upstream seem to have > dropped

Investigating the reverse dependencies of python-monotonic.

2019-08-13 Thread peter green
Hi I've been looking at various python 2 cruft packages (packages no longer built by the corresponding source packages) and why they can't be cleaned up, I have been looking in a derivative but many of my results are also relevant to debian proper. Where relevant I have been filing bugs