Hi Thomas (2020.10.09_11:12:21_+)
> For those:
>
>python-etcd3 (U)
>python-requests-mock (U)
>python-sphinxcontrib.apidoc (U)
>
> they in fact live in the OpenStack team namespace, but I don't have
> enough rights to delete the Git repositories. Can someone do it for me
> please?
On 10/3/20 9:35 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> attached the dd-list of the packages missing the pristine-tar branch
> (some may have been moved/removed, but these are actual repos in DPT)
For those:
python-etcd3 (U)
python-requests-mock (U)
python-sphinxcontrib.apidoc (U)
they in fact live
Hi,
Louis-Philippe Véronneau (2020-10-06):
> I think the first step would be modifying vcswatcher to issue warnings for:
>
> * the absence of pristine-tar branches
> * missing git tags
> * repositories using 'master' instead of 'debian/master' as the main branch
FWIW, so that nobody else spends
Hi,
IMO this is a good job for Janitor. I don't know if I would like to add the
possibility to make the
merge without human approval, but for me a MR from Janitor could be enough.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 1:14 PM Louis-Philippe Véronneau
wrote:
> On 2020-10-06 12 h 07, Louis-Philippe Véronneau
On 2020-10-06 12 h 07, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> On 2020-10-03 15 h 35, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> attached the dd-list of the packages missing the pristine-tar branch (some
>> may have been moved/removed, but these are actual repos in DPT)
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:38 AM Sandro Tosi
On 2020-10-03 15 h 35, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> attached the dd-list of the packages missing the pristine-tar branch (some
> may have been moved/removed, but these are actual repos in DPT)
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:38 AM Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> i would like to propose a project to
attached the dd-list of the packages missing the pristine-tar branch (some
may have been moved/removed, but these are actual repos in DPT)
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:38 AM Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hello,
> i would like to propose a project to make sure our teams (DPMT/PAPT)
> repos are using
[ Putting Jelmer in copy ]
On Sun, 19 Jul 2020, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 11:04 AM Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Jul 2020, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > > The checks i have in mind for now, are:
> > >
> > > * pristine-tar branch must exist, if not -> it's a bug
> > > *
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 11:04 AM Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2020, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > The checks i have in mind for now, are:
> >
> > * pristine-tar branch must exist, if not -> it's a bug
> > * pristine-tar + upstream branch must produce the same tarball as
> >
Hi,
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> The checks i have in mind for now, are:
>
> * pristine-tar branch must exist, if not -> it's a bug
> * pristine-tar + upstream branch must produce the same tarball as
> downloaded from the archive, if not -> it's a bug
> * bonus point: fix the repo
Hello,
i would like to propose a project to make sure our teams (DPMT/PAPT)
repos are using pristine-tar properly.
The checks i have in mind for now, are:
* pristine-tar branch must exist, if not -> it's a bug
* pristine-tar + upstream branch must produce the same tarball as
downloaded from the
11 matches
Mail list logo
