Re: Newcomers project: DPMT/PAPT pristine-tar verification

2020-10-09 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/3/20 9:35 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > attached the dd-list of the packages missing the pristine-tar branch > (some may have been moved/removed, but these are actual repos in DPT) For those: python-etcd3 (U) python-requests-mock (U) python-sphinxcontrib.apidoc (U) they in fact live

Re: Newcomers project: DPMT/PAPT pristine-tar verification

2020-10-06 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Louis-Philippe Véronneau (2020-10-06): > I think the first step would be modifying vcswatcher to issue warnings for: > > * the absence of pristine-tar branches > * missing git tags > * repositories using 'master' instead of 'debian/master' as the main branch FWIW, so that nobody else spends

Re: Newcomers project: DPMT/PAPT pristine-tar verification

2020-10-06 Thread Emmanuel Arias
Hi, IMO this is a good job for Janitor. I don't know if I would like to add the possibility to make the merge without human approval, but for me a MR from Janitor could be enough. On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 1:14 PM Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > On 2020-10-06 12 h 07, Louis-Philippe Véronneau

Re: Newcomers project: DPMT/PAPT pristine-tar verification

2020-10-06 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau
On 2020-10-06 12 h 07, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > On 2020-10-03 15 h 35, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> attached the dd-list of the packages missing the pristine-tar branch (some >> may have been moved/removed, but these are actual repos in DPT) >> >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:38 AM Sandro Tosi

Re: Newcomers project: DPMT/PAPT pristine-tar verification

2020-10-06 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau
On 2020-10-03 15 h 35, Sandro Tosi wrote: > attached the dd-list of the packages missing the pristine-tar branch (some > may have been moved/removed, but these are actual repos in DPT) > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:38 AM Sandro Tosi wrote: > >> Hello, >> i would like to propose a project to

Re: Newcomers project: DPMT/PAPT pristine-tar verification

2020-10-03 Thread Sandro Tosi
attached the dd-list of the packages missing the pristine-tar branch (some may have been moved/removed, but these are actual repos in DPT) On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:38 AM Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hello, > i would like to propose a project to make sure our teams (DPMT/PAPT) > repos are using

Re: Newcomers project: DPMT/PAPT pristine-tar verification

2020-07-20 Thread Raphael Hertzog
[ Putting Jelmer in copy ] On Sun, 19 Jul 2020, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 11:04 AM Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Jul 2020, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > > The checks i have in mind for now, are: > > > > > > * pristine-tar branch must exist, if not -> it's a bug > > > *

Re: Newcomers project: DPMT/PAPT pristine-tar verification

2020-07-19 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 11:04 AM Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, 10 Jul 2020, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > The checks i have in mind for now, are: > > > > * pristine-tar branch must exist, if not -> it's a bug > > * pristine-tar + upstream branch must produce the same tarball as > >

Re: Newcomers project: DPMT/PAPT pristine-tar verification

2020-07-19 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Fri, 10 Jul 2020, Sandro Tosi wrote: > The checks i have in mind for now, are: > > * pristine-tar branch must exist, if not -> it's a bug > * pristine-tar + upstream branch must produce the same tarball as > downloaded from the archive, if not -> it's a bug > * bonus point: fix the repo

Newcomers project: DPMT/PAPT pristine-tar verification

2020-07-09 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello, i would like to propose a project to make sure our teams (DPMT/PAPT) repos are using pristine-tar properly. The checks i have in mind for now, are: * pristine-tar branch must exist, if not -> it's a bug * pristine-tar + upstream branch must produce the same tarball as downloaded from the