On 08/14/2010 03:41 PM, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Am 14.08.2010 15:34, schrieb Guy Hulbert:
>> On Sat, 2010-14-08 at 15:14 +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>>> The minutes are currently polished by the participants of the BoF and
>>> will be published afterwards.
>>
>> Why do minutes need to be "polish
Am 14.08.2010 15:34, schrieb Guy Hulbert:
> On Sat, 2010-14-08 at 15:14 +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>> The minutes are currently polished by the participants of the BoF and
>> will be published afterwards.
>
> Why do minutes need to be "polished" ... ?
Maybe polished isn't the correct term. Wha
On Sat, 2010-14-08 at 15:14 +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> The minutes are currently polished by the participants of the BoF and
> will be published afterwards.
Why do minutes need to be "polished" ... ?
--
--gh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Hi,
The minutes are currently polished by the participants of the BoF and
will be published afterwards.
Cheers,
Bastian
Am 14.08.2010 09:09, schrieb Sandro Tosi:
> Hello,
> there was a BoF[1] about the plans for python in squeeze+1 but no
> minutes was sent to the list: 8 days are passed, so w
On Saturday, August 14, 2010 03:09:35 am Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hello,
> there was a BoF[1] about the plans for python in squeeze+1 but no
> minutes was sent to the list: 8 days are passed, so we have waited
> (while others, like perl team, sent it moments after the bof).
>
> [1] http://penta.debcon
Hello,
there was a BoF[1] about the plans for python in squeeze+1 but no
minutes was sent to the list: 8 days are passed, so we have waited
(while others, like perl team, sent it moments after the bof).
[1] http://penta.debconf.org/dc10_schedule/events/696.en.html
I think it's important to have s
6 matches
Mail list logo
