Re: PEP-517/PEP-518 Support In Debian

2020-06-04 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Scott, Thank you for the quick reply! Scott Kitterman writes: > On Thursday, June 4, 2020 7:39:59 PM EDT Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> Scott Kitterman writes: >> > On Monday, April 13, 2020 5:18:53 AM EDT Dmitry Shachnev wrote: >> >> Hi Scott! >> >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 06:31:57PM

Re: PEP-517/PEP-518 Support In Debian

2020-06-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, June 4, 2020 7:39:59 PM EDT Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Hi, > > Scott Kitterman writes: > > On Monday, April 13, 2020 5:18:53 AM EDT Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > >> Hi Scott! > >> > >> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 06:31:57PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> > This being roughly the

Re: PEP-517/PEP-518 Support In Debian

2020-06-04 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi, Scott Kitterman writes: > On Monday, April 13, 2020 5:18:53 AM EDT Dmitry Shachnev wrote: >> Hi Scott! >> >> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 06:31:57PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> > This being roughly the mid-point in the development cycle, I thought it >> > might be good to see where we are

Re: PEP-517/PEP-518 Support In Debian

2020-04-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, April 13, 2020 5:18:53 AM EDT Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi Scott! > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 06:31:57PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > This being roughly the mid-point in the development cycle, I thought it > > might be good to see where we are in terms of future Python packaging >

Re: PEP-517/PEP-518 Support In Debian

2020-04-13 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Scott! On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 06:31:57PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > This being roughly the mid-point in the development cycle, I thought it might > be good to see where we are in terms of future Python packaging developments. > > As I understand it, PEP-517 and PEP-518 are 'the future'.

Re: PEP-517/PEP-518 Support In Debian

2020-04-12 Thread Scott Kitterman
On April 13, 2020 3:44:31 AM UTC, Paul Wise wrote: >On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 10:32 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> I took a look at the presence of pyproject.toml files in the Debian >archive. >> There are currently 99 packages. Of those, only 28 specify a >'build-backend', >> which is required

Re: PEP-517/PEP-518 Support In Debian

2020-04-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 10:32 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: > I took a look at the presence of pyproject.toml files in the Debian archive. > There are currently 99 packages. Of those, only 28 specify a 'build-backend', > which is required by 517/518 to be useful for building a package. Is there a

PEP-517/PEP-518 Support In Debian

2020-04-12 Thread Scott Kitterman
This being roughly the mid-point in the development cycle, I thought it might be good to see where we are in terms of future Python packaging developments. As I understand it, PEP-517 and PEP-518 are 'the future'. I took a look at the presence of pyproject.toml files in the Debian archive.