* Jurko Gospodnetić: " Re: Packaging of suds-jurko (was: suds)" (Thu, 03 Jul
2014 11:32:28 +0200):
Hi Jurko,
> On 3.7.2014. 0:07, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> >> My epydocs experience is *very* rusty. How hard would it be to covert the
> >> docs to Sphinx-consum
* Barry Warsaw: " Re: Packaging of suds-jurko (was: suds)" (Wed, 2 Jul 2014
11:00:34 -0400):
> On Jul 02, 2014, at 04:16 PM, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
> >>* I still have not taken over the original project's documentation
> >> and that is something I
* Jurko Gospodnetić: " Re: Packaging of suds-jurko" (Wed, 02 Jul 2014 20:14:33
+0200):
>Hi Mathias.
>
> On 1.7.2014. 13:10, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> > The first tests on suds-jurko are looking very promising. I built the
> > package succesfully as a drop
Hi Mathias.
On 1.7.2014. 13:10, Mathias Behrle wrote:
The first tests on suds-jurko are looking very promising. I built the
package succesfully as a drop-in replacement for the current python-suds
package. It builds correctly for python2 and python3 with all tests. I tested
part of the functio
On Jul 02, 2014, at 04:16 PM, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>>* I still have not taken over the original project's documentation
>> and that is something I'd really like to do so I can update it with all
>> the fixes/updates made to the library. If anyone has experience with
>> epydocs and the tool
* Jurko Gospodnetić: " Re: Re: Packaging of suds-jurko (was: suds)" (Wed, 02
Jul 2014 12:15:35 +0200):
Hi Jurko,
[...]
>* I still have not taken over the original project's documentation
> and that is something I'd really like to do so I can update it with all
On Jul 2, 2014, at 5:09 AM, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>> *Puts on PyPI Admin Hat*
>>
>> Probably if suds-jurko or whatever is the unofficial “suds” that people
>> should
>> be using then there is a good chance that PyPI would be willing to transfer
>> the name of suds to one of the forks. I’d have
Hi all.
Probably if suds-jurko or whatever is the unofficial “suds” that
people should be using then there is a good chance that PyPI
would be willing to transfer the name of suds to one of the
forks. I’d have to talk to Richard to be sure about that but
it’s potentially an option.
That inde
* Donald Stufft: " Re: Packaging of suds-jurko (was: suds)" (Tue, 1 Jul 2014
17:55:17 -0400):
>
> On Jul 1, 2014, at 5:41 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> > On Jul 01, 2014, at 01:10 PM, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> >
> >> The first tests on suds-jurko
* Barry Warsaw: " Re: Packaging of suds-jurko (was: suds)" (Tue, 1 Jul 2014
17:41:28 -0400):
> On Jul 01, 2014, at 01:10 PM, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
> >The first tests on suds-jurko are looking very promising. I built the package
> >succesfully as a drop-in replac
On Jul 1, 2014, at 5:41 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jul 01, 2014, at 01:10 PM, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
>> The first tests on suds-jurko are looking very promising. I built the package
>> succesfully as a drop-in replacement for the current python-suds package. It
>> builds correctly for python
On Jul 01, 2014, at 01:10 PM, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>The first tests on suds-jurko are looking very promising. I built the package
>succesfully as a drop-in replacement for the current python-suds package. It
>builds correctly for python2 and python3 with all tests. I tested part of the
>functiona
* Jordan Metzmeier: " Re: suds (was: favouring Python3 in the Debian
policy)" (Thu, 8 May 2014 10:22:47 -0500):
Hi all,
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:11 AM, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> > * Jordan Metzmeier: " Re: favouring Python3 in the Debian policy" (Wed, 7
> > May 2014 21:55:20 -0500):
> >
> > He
13 matches
Mail list logo
