Re: Python 2.6 transition update

2009-10-20 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 09:31:30PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:01:05PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > Thanks for starting the roll. Imho numpy/scipy and then any other > > python- with binary modules and not absent rdepends should be indeed > > rebuilt with 2.6 a

Re: Python 2.6 transition update

2009-10-20 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Dear Yaroslav, On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:01:05PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Wow... no replies in this imho important thread... Yes, even I was a tad surprised. Thanks for the message. > Thanks for starting the roll. Imho numpy/scipy and then any other > python- with binary modules and

Re: Python 2.6 transition update

2009-10-20 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Wow... no replies in this imho important thread... Hi Kumar, Thanks for starting the roll. Imho numpy/scipy and then any other python- with binary modules and not absent rdepends should be indeed rebuilt with 2.6 and installed in the (ch)root to verify if any other 2.6 package dependent on them

Python 2.6 transition update

2009-10-14 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Dear Debian Python, As you may be aware, I have been making quite a bit of hue and cry about the Python 2.6 transition blocking bugs[1]. I have managed to submit patches for most of the packages to _make them build_ with Python 2.6. However, as Paul Wise righly points out[2], my patches merely mak