On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 09:31:30PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:01:05PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > Thanks for starting the roll. Imho numpy/scipy and then any other
> > python- with binary modules and not absent rdepends should be indeed
> > rebuilt with 2.6 a
Dear Yaroslav,
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:01:05PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Wow... no replies in this imho important thread...
Yes, even I was a tad surprised. Thanks for the message.
> Thanks for starting the roll. Imho numpy/scipy and then any other
> python- with binary modules and
Wow... no replies in this imho important thread...
Hi Kumar,
Thanks for starting the roll. Imho numpy/scipy and then any other
python- with binary modules and not absent rdepends should be indeed
rebuilt with 2.6 and installed in the (ch)root to verify if any other
2.6 package dependent on them
Dear Debian Python,
As you may be aware, I have been making quite a bit of hue and cry
about the Python 2.6 transition blocking bugs[1]. I have managed to
submit patches for most of the packages to _make them build_ with
Python 2.6. However, as Paul Wise righly points out[2], my patches
merely mak
4 matches
Mail list logo