The release team has given us a transition slot and python-defaults is ready
for upload, so we'll be starting the transition shortly. We're currently
looking into 642601. We're not aware of any other issues that might cause us
to delay.
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sep 27, 2011, at 01:35 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
The release team has given us a transition slot and python-defaults is ready
for upload, so we'll be starting the transition shortly. We're currently
looking into 642601. We're not aware of any other issues that might cause us
to delay.
On Tuesday, September 27, 2011 08:07:09 PM Luca Falavigna wrote:
Il 27/09/2011 19:35, Scott Kitterman ha scritto:
We're currently looking into 642601.
It seems some uploaders have been asked to provide an update. If they
don't react, I could prepare a team upload myself.
I'm not aware of
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 23:58:26 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Il 12/09/2011 09:53, Julien Cristau ha scritto:
So out of these, I'd expect that libimobiledevice, gobject-introspection
and pygobject (and maybe hplip?) need to be fixed, and the rest can
hopefully be removed if they stay
Il 12/09/2011 09:53, Julien Cristau ha scritto:
So out of these, I'd expect that libimobiledevice, gobject-introspection
and pygobject (and maybe hplip?) need to be fixed, and the rest can
hopefully be removed if they stay broken.
libimobiledevice, pygobject and hplip are fixed,
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Would it be possible to draw a map of things still to finish before
attempting to switch default to 2.7? There are a couple of resources
already ([0] and [1]), are there other useful bits around?
The same as the release.d.o bug, but:
Hi Luca (2011.09.11_23:38:35_+0200)
Would it be possible to draw a map of things still to finish before
attempting to switch default to 2.7? There are a couple of resources
already ([0] and [1]), are there other useful bits around?
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/622279
[1]
7 matches
Mail list logo
