QA Developer overview, compared with PET

2014-01-26 Thread Ben Finney
Nicolas Dandrimont ol...@debian.org writes: - Dust off the team's PET instance ([1], which looks rather outdated). [1] - http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/pet.cgi I've never seen PET before. It seems redundant with the official QA Packages Overview tool for each maintainer,

Re: QA Developer overview, compared with PET

2014-01-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Ben Finney wrote: Thanks for bringing PET to my attention. But I wonder whether it's unused for good reason? The only reason it is unused is people don't know about it or forget it exists. What does PET do which the Packages Overview tool does not? It looks

Re: QA Developer overview, compared with PET

2014-01-26 Thread Nicolas Dandrimont
* Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au [2014-01-27 10:37:06 +1100]: Nicolas Dandrimont ol...@debian.org writes: - Dust off the team's PET instance ([1], which looks rather outdated). [1] - http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/pet.cgi I've never seen PET before. It seems