Re: RFS: numpydoc/0.4-1 [RFP/ITP 559916]
Denis Laxalde a écrit : (I'll commit the package into the svn repo as soon as I can.) I've updated the repository: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/numpydoc/trunk/ Thanks. -- Denis Laxalde -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd8ba7c.9000...@laxalde.org
Re: RFS: numpydoc/0.4-1 [RFP/ITP 559916]
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > >On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Denis Laxalde wrote: >> >>Policy-compliant package name would be "python-numpydoc", but that >> >>could be easily confused with "python-numpy-doc". So I agree with >> >>your assessment: "python-numpydoc-sphinx" is a better for the >binary >> >>package. > >> >if it wouldn't be "convention compliant" anyways -- may be >> >python-sphinx-numpydoc? there is already python-sphinx-issuetracker >... > >> But the namespace is numpydoc not sphinx, so it's even more >> confusing, isn't it? > >that was just my .1 cents ;) yes, probably having namespace first with >some kind of qualifier (-sphinx) is more logical. I just wondered if >we >could reach some unification for 'python-sphinx' related packages. > >ah -- we also have > >python-repoze.sphinx.autointerface > >providing /usr/share/pyshared/repoze/sphinx/autointerface.py Python policy wise that's the correct name for the package. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/08bd59be-661c-4a00-b347-dd16033a1...@email.android.com
Re: RFS: numpydoc/0.4-1 [RFP/ITP 559916]
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Denis Laxalde wrote: > >>Policy-compliant package name would be "python-numpydoc", but that > >>could be easily confused with "python-numpy-doc". So I agree with > >>your assessment: "python-numpydoc-sphinx" is a better for the binary > >>package. > >if it wouldn't be "convention compliant" anyways -- may be > >python-sphinx-numpydoc? there is already python-sphinx-issuetracker ... > But the namespace is numpydoc not sphinx, so it's even more > confusing, isn't it? that was just my .1 cents ;) yes, probably having namespace first with some kind of qualifier (-sphinx) is more logical. I just wondered if we could reach some unification for 'python-sphinx' related packages. ah -- we also have python-repoze.sphinx.autointerface providing /usr/share/pyshared/repoze/sphinx/autointerface.py -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120612181413.gb15...@onerussian.com
Re: RFS: numpydoc/0.4-1 [RFP/ITP 559916]
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: Policy-compliant package name would be "python-numpydoc", but that could be easily confused with "python-numpy-doc". So I agree with your assessment: "python-numpydoc-sphinx" is a better for the binary package. if it wouldn't be "convention compliant" anyways -- may be python-sphinx-numpydoc? there is already python-sphinx-issuetracker ... But the namespace is numpydoc not sphinx, so it's even more confusing, isn't it? actually it got renamed later on into python-sphinxcontrib.issuetracker. It might be worth checking with numpydoc people if they do not have plans on placing numpydoc under sphinxcontrib namespace It seems quite unlikely to happen soon IMHO. -- Denis Laxalde -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd74fab.8080...@laxalde.org
Re: RFS: numpydoc/0.4-1 [RFP/ITP 559916]
Jakub Wilk wrote: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/numpydoc/numpydoc_0.4-1.dsc Minor nitpick: I'd use "debhelper (>= 8)" instead of "debhelper (>= 8.0.0)" in Build-Depends. (Sorry, it's my pet peeve!) Upstream provides some tests, please run the at build time. Done. Mentors updated. -- Denis Laxalde -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd74cfa.6010...@laxalde.org
Re: RFS: numpydoc/0.4-1 [RFP/ITP 559916]
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Policy-compliant package name would be "python-numpydoc", but that > could be easily confused with "python-numpy-doc". So I agree with > your assessment: "python-numpydoc-sphinx" is a better for the binary > package. if it wouldn't be "convention compliant" anyways -- may be python-sphinx-numpydoc? there is already python-sphinx-issuetracker ... actually it got renamed later on into python-sphinxcontrib.issuetracker. It might be worth checking with numpydoc people if they do not have plans on placing numpydoc under sphinxcontrib namespace just my .1 cents -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120612132716.gw15...@onerussian.com
Re: RFS: numpydoc/0.4-1 [RFP/ITP 559916]
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.) * Denis Laxalde , 2012-06-11, 20:51: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/numpydoc/numpydoc_0.4-1.dsc Minor nitpick: I'd use "debhelper (>= 8)" instead of "debhelper (>= 8.0.0)" in Build-Depends. (Sorry, it's my pet peeve!) Upstream provides some tests, please run the at build time. Policy-compliant package name would be "python-numpydoc", but that could be easily confused with "python-numpy-doc". So I agree with your assessment: "python-numpydoc-sphinx" is a better for the binary package. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120612121344.ga1...@jwilk.net
RFS: numpydoc/0.4-1 [RFP/ITP 559916]
Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "numpydoc" (see RFP/ITP #559916). * Package name: numpydoc Version : 0.4 Upstream Author : Pauli Virtanen and others * URL : https://github.com/numpy/numpy/tree/master/doc/sphinxext * License : BSD Section : python It builds the following binary package: python-numpydoc-sphinx - Sphinx extension to support docstrings in Numpy format To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/numpydoc Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/numpydoc/numpydoc_0.4-1.dsc (I'll commit the package into the svn repo as soon as I can.) Thanks. -- Denis Laxalde -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd6928d.8080...@laxalde.org
