On Tue, 03 Jan 2012, Kay Hayen wrote:
> >* custom get-orig-source rule in debian/rules -- most popular way to
> > automate things of this kind ;)
> That's just where to put it, not what to put there?
yeap... "what" could indeed be either a call to dh_wraporig or just a
tandem of two tar comman
Hello Yaroslav,
you wrote:
* once I had wrote a little helper for myself
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-exppsy/tools/dh_wraporig?view=markup
which I had used for many cases like this, it was also autogenerating
README.Debian-source
which summarized the changes
That looks in
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012, Kay Hayen wrote:
> >ii (somewhat preferable). remove scons from within .orig.tar.gz
> >(optionally add +dfsg or .dfsg suffix to the version making it
> >0.3.17~pre2+dfsg-1)
> Done that. Although it was kind of hurtful to integrate. :-) Is
> there really nobody who has a tool t
* Yaroslav Halchenko , 2012-01-02, 15:49:
to bloat .orig.tar.gz if there is an easy way to avoid it, while also
making 100%-proof that contained copy of 3rd party code is used
instead of system-wide one.
You can "rm -rf" it early in the build process to assure that. E.g.,
if you use dh, overrid
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >to bloat .orig.tar.gz if there is an easy way to avoid it, while
> >also making 100%-proof that contained copy of 3rd party code is
> >used instead of system-wide one.
> You can "rm -rf" it early in the build process to assure that. E.g.,
> if you use dh,
* Yaroslav Halchenko , 2012-01-02, 15:15:
i. don't remove scons but just (minimalistic patch) make system
wide used
then you would need still to add its copyright/license into
debian/copyright, just add a comment that those are not used
ii (somewhat preferable). remove scons from within .orig.tar
Hello Jakub,
you wrote:
ii (somewhat preferable). remove scons from within .orig.tar.gz
I disagree that (ii) is preferable. You should not repack upstream
source unless you have to. (Please see ftp-master's reject FAQ.)
Thanks for the pointer, I looked at it.
(optionally add +dfsg or .df
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >i. don't remove scons but just (minimalistic patch) make system
> >wide used
> > then you would need still to add its copyright/license into
> > debian/copyright, just add a comment that those are not used
> >ii (somewhat preferable). remove scons from wit
* Yaroslav Halchenko , 2012-01-01, 18:33:
i. don't remove scons but just (minimalistic patch) make system wide
used
then you would need still to add its copyright/license into
debian/copyright, just add a comment that those are not used
ii (somewhat preferable). remove scons from within .ori
Hello Yaroslav,
thanks for the review, really helpful. I tried to address all the
problems and have uploaded another package.
You wrote:
1. version
0.3.17pre2-1
if 'pre' means prior 0.3.17, then make it 0.3.17~pre2-1 otherwise
it would sort after (use dpkg --compare-versions in cmdline i
Happy New Year!
so let's begin ;)
1. version
0.3.17pre2-1
if 'pre' means prior 0.3.17, then make it 0.3.17~pre2-1 otherwise
it would sort after (use dpkg --compare-versions in cmdline if you want
to check for sure how versions get sorted)
2. debian/copyright
a. separate main copyright state
Dear Debian Python Team,
I am out of review comments for the package of mine:
* Package name: nuitka
Version : 0.3.17pre2-1
Upstream Author : Kay Hayen
* URL : http://nuitka.net
* License : GPLv3
Section : python
It builds those binary packag
12 matches
Mail list logo
