Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages?

2022-05-24 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
Yeah, this is already happening. If the janitor starts making other sorts of changes in the future, I'll check in here first rather than just enabling those. Jelmer On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 10:30:57AM +, stefa...@debian.org wrote: > Hi Sandro (2022.03.29_21:46:29_+) > > Seeing Jelmer

Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages?

2022-05-24 Thread stefanor
Hi Sandro (2022.03.29_21:46:29_+) Seeing Jelmer reminded me about this thread. I have no objection, so count this as an approval. I thought Janitor was already doing this, though... SR > Piotr, Stefano, Bernd, Scott, Ondrey, > as owners of the DPT salsa team ( >

Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages?

2022-03-29 Thread Sandro Tosi
Piotr, Stefano, Bernd, Scott, Ondrey, as owners of the DPT salsa team ( https://salsa.debian.org/groups/python-team/packages/-/group_members?sort=access_level_desc) can you approve (or deny) this request, and so give access to Janitor to directly commit to all our repos, instead of filing MRs?

Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages?

2022-02-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 02:31:13AM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > On 2/18/22 2:23 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > thanks for bringing the perspective of how things are done in the Med > > team, but it feels none of the points you mentioned nor the specific > > Med team workflow apply here, > > I

Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages?

2022-02-17 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 2/18/22 2:23 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: I admit I'm hesitating a bit for different reasons. While I agree that direct commits are better than MRs I found several DPT packages with very sensible changes in Git but no uploads following these. For instance fixing VCS fields and Maintainer name

Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages?

2022-02-17 Thread Sandro Tosi
> I admit I'm hesitating a bit for different reasons. While I agree that > direct commits are better than MRs I found several DPT packages with > very sensible changes in Git but no uploads following these. For > instance fixing VCS fields and Maintainer name should be followed by an > according

Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages?

2022-02-17 Thread Emmanuel Arias
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 2:48 PM Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > On 2022-02-17 12 h 39, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > Hello all, > > the question is essentially all in the subject line, and my answer is > yes. > > > > I receive notifications for all MRs opened against DPT packages, and > > Janitor's

Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages?

2022-02-17 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau
On 2022-02-17 12 h 39, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hello all, > the question is essentially all in the subject line, and my answer is yes. > > I receive notifications for all MRs opened against DPT packages, and > Janitor's are always pretty much ready to merge as is, and so i think > we should let

Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages?

2022-02-17 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello all, the question is essentially all in the subject line, and my answer is yes. I receive notifications for all MRs opened against DPT packages, and Janitor's are always pretty much ready to merge as is, and so i think we should let Janitor commit directly to the team packages. Jelmer is