Florent Rougon wrote:
> Yes, I know the technical conditions that justify Conflicts and
> Replaces, I only proposed them as a means to get users' package managers
> to automatically propose the upgrade from python-dialog to
> python3-dialog...
Hmm... I believe I spoke a bit quickly and that this
Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> Replaces: would not be appropriate or necessary since none of the
> files are overlapping; this is only necessary when two packages
> install files to the same location, and the one package must be
> installed over the other.
>
> Conflicts: would not be appropriate eith
On 22 October 2014 09:47, Florent Rougon wrote:
> It is in unstable, thank you! I wonder if the new package
> (python3-dialog) should not have Conflicts and Replaces with
> python-dialog. Although I suppose both packages can be installed at the
> same time, the current situation may leave the old,
Hi,
Tristan Seligmann wrote:
>> The package is already uploaded, right?
>
> It is, and processed through NEW. I uploaded -2 earlier today to fix
> #766041 and I believe it is now in unstable; it looks like the PTS
> isn't updated yet, though, possibly related to some problems with
> Debian infra
On 19 October 2014 23:21, Florent Rougon wrote:
> Thank you very much, that was quick! I have subscribed using:
>
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/pts.cgi?what=advanced&package=source_package_name&email=y...@email.com
>
> The package is already uploaded, right?
It is, and processed th
'evening!
Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> Looks like your Debian account is marked emeritus; if you wish to
> re-activate it you could follow the process described here:
>
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/developer-duties.html#returning
Thanks for the info, maybe later...
>
On 19 October 2014 14:40, Florent Rougon wrote:
> would be glad to be co-maintainer of the package. (I am a former DD, so
> maybe there is some account (frn) to reuse instead of creating a new
> one...)
Looks like your Debian account is marked emeritus; if you wish to
re-activate it you could fol
Hi,
Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> Thus I intend to take over the existing ITA and inject Florent's
> source package into DPMT now, under the old source package name
> (pythondialog), and review it for upload. Florent, would you like to
> be listed as one of the package co-maintainers? If you don't
On 17 October 2014 17:59, Florent Rougon wrote:
> Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
>> Please note that this is not a team-maintained package. We could do a
>> non-maintainer upload of it, but I'd rather see either 1) Adam, the current
>> maintainer CC'd here, update the package, or 2) have Adam move the pa
Hi,
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Please note that this is not a team-maintained package. We could do a
> non-maintainer upload of it, but I'd rather see either 1) Adam, the current
> maintainer CC'd here, update the package, or 2) have Adam move the package to
> the Debian Python team, where we could
Am 17.10.2014 um 17:03 schrieb Barry Warsaw:
> Hi Florent,
>
> On Oct 17, 2014, at 04:17 PM, Florent Rougon wrote:
>
>> As the upstream maintainer of pythondialog, I feel a bit concerned about
>> its status in Debian, in particular about what is going to go into
>> jessie. In short, I'd rather se
Hi Florent,
On Oct 17, 2014, at 04:17 PM, Florent Rougon wrote:
>As the upstream maintainer of pythondialog, I feel a bit concerned about
>its status in Debian, in particular about what is going to go into
>jessie. In short, I'd rather see the package removed from Debian than
>stay in the current
Hello,
As the upstream maintainer of pythondialog, I feel a bit concerned about
its status in Debian, in particular about what is going to go into
jessie. In short, I'd rather see the package removed from Debian than
stay in the current status.
The package that is currently in unstable is terribl
13 matches
Mail list logo
