Re: Two django packages for Debian?

On Aug 19, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: >I usually don't care much about preserving local intra-upload vcs history Ah, except for the case where I want to collaborate with someone on the new version, e.g. to get a code review of some packaging change *before* it gets uploaded. This is

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

> If it were well integrated with quilt, I think it would be fine to have > source-full branches. I like this aspect of UDD, but I've also become > comfortable working with our svn debian-only branches. It usually means > unpacking the tarball, cd'ing into that directory and symlinking in debian/

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

On Aug 09, 2014, at 06:02 PM, Brian May wrote: >At the moment, in subversion, we only store the debian/* directory. Is >there any requirement/benefit in putting the full upstream source in git >too? If it were well integrated with quilt, I think it would be fine to have source-full branches. I l

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

On Aug 06, 2014, at 04:08 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >and I would love to try them all before we make a decision¹ Me too. Should we relax the team preference for one vcs to rule them all, at least for a period of experimentation and experience sharing? I still *really* want to end up in a plac

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

On Aug 06, 2014, at 02:28 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >I am on the edge. I prefer dgit, as it's the only one the guarantees >round-trip save with the archive even when someone NMUs things without using >dgit. From this description, it sounds like dgit is the closest equivalent to Ubuntu Distri

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

On 08/06/2014 10:08 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >> I am on the edge. I prefer dgit > > and I would love to try them all before we make a decision¹ > > If one wants us to consider XYZ, please send a link to test repo and a > list of commands that will let us deal f.e. with such problems: > > * how

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > [Raphael Hertzog, 2014-08-13] > > > * old patch needs an update, what should I do? > > > (quilt edit? quilt refresh? XYZ rebase on a different branch?) > > > * new patch is needed, how can I add it? > > > (quilt new? another branch?) > > > > I don'

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

Raphael Hertzog writes: > So let me give my own answer to some of the questions asked here. These questions would best be answered in a ‘debian/README.source’ document giving all the information needed to work with the Debian source for the package. -- \ “You can be a victor without hav

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

[Raphael Hertzog, 2014-08-13] > > * old patch needs an update, what should I do? > > (quilt edit? quilt refresh? XYZ rebase on a different branch?) > > * new patch is needed, how can I add it? > > (quilt new? another branch?) > > I don't see the need for the team to impose anything here. patch

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

So let me give my own answer to some of the questions asked here. On Wed, 06 Aug 2014, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > However, it does not integrate with git-dpm at the moment and there is > no clear conversion / vcs history import available. Do we care about > preserving vcs history for our package

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

On 7 August 2014 00:08, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > I am on the edge. I prefer dgit > > and I would love to try them all before we make a decisionน > Would be interested in a brief summary of the different workflows possible, and a comparison. I have not been keeping up. At the moment, in subver

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

Hi Matthew, On Wed, 06 Aug 2014, Matthew Vernon wrote: > Is 1.7 released yet? At least Grappelli only aims to work with released > versions, so I think it's currently only 1.6-compatible. I'd expect > 1.7-support to be along once that's been out for a bit. 1.7 will be out in a few days/weeks and

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

Hi, On 06/08/14 07:47, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 05 Aug 2014, Matthew Vernon wrote: >> https://git.csx.cam.ac.uk/x/ucs/u/mcv21/django-grappelli.git >> https://git.csx.cam.ac.uk/x/ucs/u/mcv21/django-stronghold.git > [...] >> Naturally, I'd like to upload these as maintained by >> py

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

On 06/08/14 04:25, Brian May wrote: > On 6 August 2014 03:11, Matthew Vernon > wrote: > > I've packaged up django-grappelli and django-stronghold (since we have > need for them at work). I think my debianisations are sane, but I've > done them in git not sub

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

> I am on the edge. I prefer dgit and I would love to try them all before we make a decision¹ If one wants us to consider XYZ, please send a link to test repo and a list of commands that will let us deal f.e. with such problems: * how can I fetch foo sources? what about updating all packages in

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

On 6 August 2014 14:18, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Aug 06, 2014, at 08:47 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > >>(That said I'm also rather annoyed by the fact that the team hasn't switched >>to git yet.) > > We've had these discussions on this mailing list before, but I think we should > discuss it at Debc

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

On Aug 06, 2014, at 08:47 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >(That said I'm also rather annoyed by the fact that the team hasn't switched >to git yet.) We've had these discussions on this mailing list before, but I think we should discuss it at Debconf. While obviously we won't have full representation

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

Hi, On Tue, 05 Aug 2014, Matthew Vernon wrote: > https://git.csx.cam.ac.uk/x/ucs/u/mcv21/django-grappelli.git > https://git.csx.cam.ac.uk/x/ucs/u/mcv21/django-stronghold.git [...] > Naturally, I'd like to upload these as maintained by > python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org. Is that going to

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

On 6 August 2014 03:11, Matthew Vernon wrote: > I've packaged up django-grappelli and django-stronghold (since we have > need for them at work). I think my debianisations are sane, but I've > done them in git not subversion. Repos: > Please make sure these work with Django 1.7 in experimental...

Two django packages for Debian?

Hi, I've packaged up django-grappelli and django-stronghold (since we have need for them at work). I think my debianisations are sane, but I've done them in git not subversion. Repos: https://git.csx.cam.ac.uk/x/ucs/u/mcv21/django-grappelli.git https://git.csx.cam.ac.uk/x/ucs/u/mcv21/django-stron