Re: Work on a current Debian Python policy (was: Lintian warnings for Python packaging?)

2009-11-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 02 novembre 2009 à 21:22 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit : Is there a silent Debian Python policy drafter out there who would like to step forward? Or is this work now moribund? Bug reports concerning the Python policy have been silently ignored. I’m afraid this will last as long as the

Re: Work on a current Debian Python policy

2009-11-03 Thread Ben Finney
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes: Le lundi 02 novembre 2009 à 21:22 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit : Is there a silent Debian Python policy drafter out there who would like to step forward? Or is this work now moribund? Bug reports concerning the Python policy have been silently

Re: Work on a current Debian Python policy (was: Lintian warnings for Python packaging?)

2009-11-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:02:21 +0100 Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote: Le lundi 02 novembre 2009 à 21:22 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit : Is there a silent Debian Python policy drafter out there who would like to step forward? Or is this work now moribund? Bug reports concerning the Python

Re: Work on a current Debian Python policy

2009-11-03 Thread Ben Finney
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes: Le lundi 02 novembre 2009 à 21:22 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit : Is there a silent Debian Python policy drafter out there who would like to step forward? Or is this work now moribund? Bug reports concerning the Python policy have been silently

Re: Work on a current Debian Python policy

2009-11-03 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote: (I am reading this to mean “the reference version of the Debian Python policy is in the python-defaults package”.) Okay. Clearly one way for this to improve would be for some of those bug reports to be responded to

Work on a current Debian Python policy (was: Lintian warnings for Python packaging?)

2009-11-02 Thread Ben Finney
Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org writes: Scott Kitterman ha scritto: Since we currently lack anything like a maintained Python policy, I think this is putting the cart before the horse. […] […] we could wait for the new policy to be drafted, I'm not sure when this will happen, though.

Re: Work on a current Debian Python policy (was: Lintian warnings for Python packaging?)

2009-11-02 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote: I'm not aware of any ongoing work.  I would be willing to help work on such a thing, but we currently lack a good mechanism for developing/approving such a policy. With clear policy and precise goal you won't need

Re: Work on a current Debian Python policy (was: Lintian warnings for Python packaging?)

2009-11-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:50:00 +0300 anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote: I'm not aware of any ongoing work.  I would be willing to help work on such a thing, but we currently lack a good mechanism for